Skip to content

Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice)

On the 78 use cases both models ran, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) won 68 to 10 (better outcome first, then lower cost).

Pass rate: Claude Opus 5.5 100% (78 runs) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) 88% (82 runs). Average cost per run: $0.21 vs $0.01.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice)
Runs on shared use cases7882
Pass rate100% (78/78)88% (72/82)
Avg cost per run$0.21$0.01
Avg wall time2m2m
Step-ins per run0.100.10
Use cases won1068

Use case by use case

Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.