Skip to content

Rewrite a legalese policy in plain language without losing or inventing rules

Exact prompt

# Task: plain-language rewrite Rewrite `inputs/policy.md` for employees as `policy_plain.md`. Requirements: - Flesch Reading Ease >= 60 (short sentences, common words). Word count 180–350. - Keep EVERY rule and number; add no new rules or numbers. Use a short intro, then bullet points or short headed sections, then a "Quick example" with one worked case that only uses numbers from the policy. - Second person ("you"). No legalese ("notwithstanding", "herein", "pursuant", "shall"). No network.

Rewrite a company policy in plain language for employees, reaching a Flesch reading-ease score of at least 60 in 180-350 words. Every rule and number must survive, nothing new may be added, and the worked example can only use numbers from the policy. Original benchmark task written for usecaserank.com (not based on a specific public post). Headless, offline run on a reproducible fixture. Each run's notes say how its cost was measured (estimates are marked).

Success criteria: 1. Flesch Reading Ease >= 60 (scorer's own heuristic syllable count). 2. 180–350 words. 3. All 14 key rules/facts from the policy present (attendance threshold, reimbursement cap and period, extra chair allowance with medical note, claim deadline, itemised receipt, ownership threshold, return deadline, excluded categories internet/utilities/decor, approval time, payroll timing). 4. No new numbers: every number must appear in the source policy (integers 0–3 allowed). 5. No legalese words (notwithstanding, herein, pursuant, shall, aforementioned, enumerated). 6. Second person: 'you/your' used at least 5 times. 7. Contains a 'Quick example' section.

Best model for this task so far: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) (thinking on) (success, $0.0045, 26s).

Run this on another model

All runs (5)

100% pass rate across 5 eligible runs: 5 pass, 0 partial, 0 fail. Partial and failed runs are listed below with everything else.ⓘ

Runs for this use case
ModelCostTimeStep-insⓘAutonomyOutcomeTrustⓘDateCompare
OGPT-6.1 Soldefault · thinking on$0.0337s0Fully autonomouspassTrust 80%2026-10-22
DDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice)thinking on$0.004526s0Fully autonomouspassTrust 80%2026-10-20
AClaude Haiku 5.5default · thinking on$0.006631s0Fully autonomouspassTrust 80%2026-10-16
AClaude Opus 5.5default · thinking on$0.1639s0Fully autonomouspassTrust 80%2026-10-16
AClaude Sonnet 5.5default · thinking on$0.0617s0Fully autonomouspassTrust 80%2026-10-16

Embed this result

A live badge for this use case. It links back here and updates as new runs are published.

UseCaseRank badge for Rewrite a legalese policy in plain language without losing or inventing rules

Get new runs and ranking changes weekly

Which models got better or cheaper on real tasks like this one.