Skip to content

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice)

On the 78 use cases both models ran, Claude Haiku 5.5 won 49 to 29 (better outcome first, then lower cost).

Pass rate: Claude Haiku 5.5 100% (79 runs) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) 88% (82 runs). Average cost per run: $0.0082 vs $0.01.

MetricClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice)
Runs on shared use cases7982
Pass rate100% (79/79)88% (72/82)
Avg cost per run$0.0082$0.01
Avg wall time2m2m
Step-ins per run0.100.10
Use cases won4929

Use case by use case

Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.