Skip to content

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice)

On the 43 use cases both models ran, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) won 27 to 16 (better outcome first, then lower cost).

Pass rate: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) 89% (47 runs) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) 60% (43 runs). Average cost per run: $0.01 vs $0.0075.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice)Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice)
Runs on shared use cases4743
Pass rate89% (42/47)60% (26/43)
Avg cost per run$0.01$0.0075
Avg wall time2m1m
Step-ins per run0.000.00
Use cases won2716

Use case by use case

Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.