Skip to content

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice)

On the 51 use cases both models ran, Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) won 28 to 22, with 1 tied (better outcome first, then lower cost).

Pass rate: Claude Sonnet 5.5 98% (51 runs) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) 55% (51 runs). Average cost per run: $0.07 vs $0.0078.

MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice)
Runs on shared use cases5151
Pass rate98% (50/51)55% (28/51)
Avg cost per run$0.07$0.0078
Avg wall time21s57s
Step-ins per run0.080.06
Use cases won2228

Use case by use case

Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.