Skip to content

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice)

On the 51 use cases both models ran, Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) won 28 to 23 (better outcome first, then lower cost).

Pass rate: Claude Opus 5.5 96% (51 runs) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) 55% (51 runs). Average cost per run: $0.22 vs $0.0078.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice)
Runs on shared use cases5151
Pass rate96% (49/51)55% (28/51)
Avg cost per run$0.22$0.0078
Avg wall time50s57s
Step-ins per run0.080.06
Use cases won2328

Use case by use case

Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.