Skip to content

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) vs GPT-6.1 Sol

On the 45 use cases both models ran, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) won 39 to 5, with 1 tied (better outcome first, then lower cost).

Pass rate: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) 87% (45 runs) vs GPT-6.1 Sol 96% (45 runs). Average cost per run: $0.01 vs $0.05.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice)GPT-6.1 Sol
Runs on shared use cases4545
Pass rate87% (39/45)96% (43/45)
Avg cost per run$0.01$0.05
Avg wall time2m1m
Step-ins per run0.000.00
Use cases won395

Use case by use case

Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.