Skip to content

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Llama 3.2 3B (local)

On the 16 use cases both models ran, Claude Opus 5.5 won 16 to 0 (better outcome first, then lower cost).

Pass rate: Claude Opus 5.5 100% (16 runs) vs Llama 3.2 3B (local) 0% (16 runs). Average cost per run: $0.22 vs $0 (local).

MetricClaude Opus 5.5Llama 3.2 3B (local)
Runs on shared use cases1616
Pass rate100% (16/16)0% (0/16)
Avg cost per run$0.22$0 (local)
Avg wall time48s15s
Step-ins per run1.690.00
Use cases won160

Use case by use case

Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.