Skip to content

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen2.5 7B (local)

On the 15 use cases both models ran, Claude Haiku 5.5 won 14 to 1 (better outcome first, then lower cost).

Pass rate: Claude Haiku 5.5 100% (15 runs) vs Qwen2.5 7B (local) 7% (15 runs). Average cost per run: $0.0081 vs $0 (local).

MetricClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5 7B (local)
Runs on shared use cases1515
Pass rate100% (15/15)7% (1/15)
Avg cost per run$0.0081$0 (local)
Avg wall time32s33s
Step-ins per run1.530.67
Use cases won141

Use case by use case

Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.