Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Venice) vs GLM 4.7 (Venice)
On the 10 use cases both models ran, GLM 4.7 (Venice) won 8 to 1, with 1 tied (better outcome first, then lower cost).
Pass rate: Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Venice) 10% (10 runs) vs GLM 4.7 (Venice) 80% (10 runs). Average cost per run: $0.0033 vs $0.02.
| Metric | Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Venice) | GLM 4.7 (Venice) |
|---|---|---|
| Runs on shared use cases | 10 | 10 |
| Pass rate | 10% (1/10) | 80% (8/10) |
| Avg cost per run | $0.0033 | $0.02 |
| Avg wall time | 1m | 6m |
| Step-ins per run | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Use cases won | 1 | 8 |
Use case by use case
- Backtest a moving-average crossover on a bundled synthetic price file: GLM 4.7 (Venice) better (pass 0% vs 100%)
- Boat fuel range with a reserve over a planned trip: GLM 4.7 (Venice) better (pass 0% vs 0%)
- Catch log checked against a made-up fishing regulations table: tie (pass 0% vs 0%)
- Debt avalanche vs snowball schedule to the cent: GLM 4.7 (Venice) better (pass 0% vs 100%)
- Discounted cash flow valuation with mid-year option and a sensitivity grid: Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Progressive tax on fictional brackets, and pre-tax vs after-tax savings comparison: GLM 4.7 (Venice) better (pass 0% vs 100%)
- Read a synthetic annual-report excerpt and compute financial ratios: GLM 4.7 (Venice) better (pass 0% vs 100%)
- Retirement drawdown with a 4% rule, inflation raises and a skip-raise-after-loss guardrail: GLM 4.7 (Venice) better (pass 0% vs 100%)
- Seeded Monte Carlo retirement odds against a stated success threshold: GLM 4.7 (Venice) better (pass 0% vs 100%)
- Work backward from a retirement budget to a savings target, contributions and earliest retirement age: GLM 4.7 (Venice) better (pass 0% vs 100%)
Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.