Skip to content

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Venice) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice)

On the 16 use cases both models ran, Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) won 10 to 3, with 3 tied (better outcome first, then lower cost).

Pass rate: Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Venice) 13% (16 runs) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) 56% (16 runs). Average cost per run: $0.0040 vs $0.0094.

MetricMistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Venice)Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice)
Runs on shared use cases1616
Pass rate13% (2/16)56% (9/16)
Avg cost per run$0.0040$0.0094
Avg wall time2m1m
Step-ins per run0.000.00
Use cases won310

Use case by use case

Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.