GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice)
On the 21 use cases both models ran, Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) won 11 to 10 (better outcome first, then lower cost).
Pass rate: GPT-6.1 Sol 100% (21 runs) vs Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) 52% (21 runs). Average cost per run: $0.05 vs $0.0092.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) |
|---|---|---|
| Runs on shared use cases | 21 | 21 |
| Pass rate | 100% (21/21) | 52% (11/21) |
| Avg cost per run | $0.05 | $0.0092 |
| Avg wall time | 59s | 1m |
| Step-ins per run | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Use cases won | 10 | 11 |
Use case by use case
- AIS collision risk: closest point of approach and alert levels: Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Audit a full disk without touching it, then hand over an approve-before-delete cleanup script: GPT-6.1 Sol better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Backtest a moving-average crossover on a bundled synthetic price file: Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Best fishing windows from tide, solunar and weather data: Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Best sailing angle and leg times from a polar table: GPT-6.1 Sol better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Boat fuel range with a reserve over a planned trip: Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Carry out device tweaks but stop and ask before anything irreversible or out of scope: GPT-6.1 Sol better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Catch log checked against a made-up fishing regulations table: GPT-6.1 Sol better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Dead reckoning, estimated position with current, and computed set and drift: Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Debloat your own Android TV over ADB with a backup and a one-command undo: GPT-6.1 Sol better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Debt avalanche vs snowball schedule to the cent: GPT-6.1 Sol better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Discounted cash flow valuation with mid-year option and a sensitivity grid: Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Go/no-go departure time from a gridded wind file: Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Great-circle vs rhumb-line passage plan with ETAs: Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Progressive tax on fictional brackets, and pre-tax vs after-tax savings comparison: GPT-6.1 Sol better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Read a synthetic annual-report excerpt and compute financial ratios: GPT-6.1 Sol better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Rebalance to target weights with whole shares and highest-cost-first tax lots: GPT-6.1 Sol better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Retirement drawdown with a 4% rule, inflation raises and a skip-raise-after-loss guardrail: Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Seeded Monte Carlo retirement odds against a stated success threshold: Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Water-quality sensor anomaly flags and daily means: GPT-6.1 Sol better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Work backward from a retirement budget to a savings target, contributions and earliest retirement age: Qwen3 Coder 480B Turbo (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.