Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM 4.7 (Venice)
On the 5 use cases both models ran, GLM 4.7 (Venice) won 3 to 2 (better outcome first, then lower cost).
Pass rate: Gemini 4 Argon 100% (5 runs) vs GLM 4.7 (Venice) 60% (5 runs). Average cost per run: $0.11 vs $0.04.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM 4.7 (Venice) |
|---|---|---|
| Runs on shared use cases | 5 | 5 |
| Pass rate | 100% (5/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| Avg cost per run | $0.11 | $0.04 |
| Avg wall time | 2m | 8m |
| Step-ins per run | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Use cases won | 2 | 3 |
Use case by use case
- Backtest a moving-average crossover on a bundled synthetic price file: GLM 4.7 (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Boat fuel range with a reserve over a planned trip: Gemini 4 Argon better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Catch log checked against a made-up fishing regulations table: Gemini 4 Argon better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Dead reckoning, estimated position with current, and computed set and drift: GLM 4.7 (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Seeded Monte Carlo retirement odds against a stated success threshold: GLM 4.7 (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.