Gemini 4 Argon vs Kimi K3.1 Pro (Venice)
On the 4 use cases both models ran, Gemini 4 Argon won 3 to 1 (better outcome first, then lower cost).
Pass rate: Gemini 4 Argon 100% (4 runs) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro (Venice) 100% (4 runs). Average cost per run: $0.13 vs $0.23.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Venice) |
|---|---|---|
| Runs on shared use cases | 4 | 4 |
| Pass rate | 100% (4/4) | 100% (4/4) |
| Avg cost per run | $0.13 | $0.23 |
| Avg wall time | 2m | 8m |
| Step-ins per run | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Use cases won | 3 | 1 |
Use case by use case
- Backtest a moving-average crossover on a bundled synthetic price file: Gemini 4 Argon better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Life-like automaton from RLE with a Klein-bottle grid and a playable animated page: Gemini 4 Argon better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Model a game-ready low-poly 3D prop from a one-line brief, within a tight triangle budget: Kimi K3.1 Pro (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Seeded Monte Carlo retirement odds against a stated success threshold: Gemini 4 Argon better (pass 100% vs 100%)
Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.