Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM 4.7 (Venice)
On the 3 use cases both models ran, Gemini 3.8 Flash won 2 to 1 (better outcome first, then lower cost).
Pass rate: Gemini 3.8 Flash 100% (3 runs) vs GLM 4.7 (Venice) 33% (3 runs). Average cost per run: $0.33 vs $0.05.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash | GLM 4.7 (Venice) |
|---|---|---|
| Runs on shared use cases | 3 | 3 |
| Pass rate | 100% (3/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Avg cost per run | $0.33 | $0.05 |
| Avg wall time | 3m | 12m |
| Step-ins per run | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Use cases won | 2 | 1 |
Use case by use case
- Boat fuel range with a reserve over a planned trip: Gemini 3.8 Flash better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Catch log checked against a made-up fishing regulations table: Gemini 3.8 Flash better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Dead reckoning, estimated position with current, and computed set and drift: GLM 4.7 (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.