DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Venice)
On the 19 use cases both models ran, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) won 16 to 3 (better outcome first, then lower cost).
Pass rate: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) 95% (19 runs) vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Venice) 16% (19 runs). Average cost per run: $0.01 vs $0.0040.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) | Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Venice) |
|---|---|---|
| Runs on shared use cases | 19 | 19 |
| Pass rate | 95% (18/19) | 16% (3/19) |
| Avg cost per run | $0.01 | $0.0040 |
| Avg wall time | 1m | 2m |
| Step-ins per run | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Use cases won | 16 | 3 |
Use case by use case
- AIS collision risk: closest point of approach and alert levels: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Anchor drag alarm from a GPS track: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Backtest a moving-average crossover on a bundled synthetic price file: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 0% vs 0%)
- Best fishing windows from tide, solunar and weather data: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Best sailing angle and leg times from a polar table: Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Boat fuel range with a reserve over a planned trip: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Catch log checked against a made-up fishing regulations table: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Debt avalanche vs snowball schedule to the cent: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Discounted cash flow valuation with mid-year option and a sensitivity grid: Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Go/no-go departure time from a gridded wind file: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Mortgage amortization with extra monthly payments and lump sums: Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 100%)
- Pension claiming-age comparison: lifetime totals, present values and break-even ages: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Progressive tax on fictional brackets, and pre-tax vs after-tax savings comparison: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Read a synthetic annual-report excerpt and compute financial ratios: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Rebalance to target weights with whole shares and highest-cost-first tax lots: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Retirement drawdown with a 4% rule, inflation raises and a skip-raise-after-loss guardrail: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Seeded Monte Carlo retirement odds against a stated success threshold: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Tide height by rule of twelfths and cosine, with under-keel clearance windows: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
- Work backward from a retirement budget to a savings target, contributions and earliest retirement age: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Venice) better (pass 100% vs 0%)
Only use cases both models ran are compared; all settings of each model are grouped. How we score.