Fix cache invalidation in an incremental static-site builder (transitive partials, config, deletions, same-second edits)
Exact prompt
# Task: fix the incremental builder's cache invalidation `minibuild.py` builds `site/out/*.html` from `site/src/*.md` and caches what it built in `site/.cache.json`. Users report stale pages: editing a partial (even one included indirectly) doesn't update pages, changing `config.json` doesn't either, quick successive edits within the same second are missed, deleted pages leave their HTML behind, and deleting or hand-editing an output file isn't repaired. Fix the caching in `minibuild.py` so that after **any** sequence of changes, `python3 minibuild.py site` leaves `out/` exactly equal to a clean full build (same files, same bytes, no extra files), while still being incremental: a page is rewritten only if its output would change or its output file is missing/modified. Pages unaffected by a change must not be rewritten at all (the grader checks output file timestamps). Note: the grader resets the timestamps of all output files to an old value before each build, so detect missing/modified outputs by their content (e.g. a hash), not by their timestamps. Only config keys a page actually uses (`site_title` is used by every page; `{{var KEY}}` by the pages containing it, directly or through partials) should cause it to rebuild. Keep the rendering output and the command line unchanged; `build()` should still return the list of rebuilt page names. Standard library only. No network.
Over-invalidating fails the minimal-rebuild checks; under-invalidating fails correctness. Mtime-based caches miss same-second edits, dependency tracking must be transitive and config-key aware, and outputs must be repaired and pruned. Original benchmark task written for usecaserank.com (not based on a specific public post). Headless, offline run on a reproducible fixture. Each run's notes say how its cost was measured (estimates are marked).
Success criteria: 1. clean_build_correct: a first build produces out/ identical to a clean build by the original renderer. 2. For each of 11 change scenarios (indirect partial edit, used config var, site_title, same-mtime source edit, deleted page, deleted output, hand-edited output, new page, no change, touch with identical content, unrelated config key) <scenario>_correct: out/ is byte-identical to a clean full build with no extra files. 3. For each of those 11 scenarios <scenario>_minimal: exactly the expected set of output files is rewritten (others keep their timestamps).
Best model for this task so far: Claude Haiku 5.5 (effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) (success, $0.0095, 44s).
All runs (4)
100% pass rate across 4 eligible runs: 4 pass, 0 partial, 0 fail. Partial and failed runs are listed below with everything else.ⓘ
| Model | Cost | Time | Step-insⓘ | Autonomy | Outcome | Trustⓘ | Date | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGPT-6.1 Soldefault · thinking on | $0.07 | 1m | 0 | Fully autonomous | pass | Trust 80% | 2026-10-22 | |
| AClaude Haiku 5.5default · thinking on | $0.0095 | 44s | 0 | Fully autonomous | pass | Trust 80% | 2026-10-17 | |
| AClaude Opus 5.5default · thinking on | $0.23 | 55s | 0 | Fully autonomous | pass | Trust 80% | 2026-10-17 | |
| AClaude Sonnet 5.5default · thinking on | $0.06 | 28s | 0 | Fully autonomous | pass | Trust 80% | 2026-10-17 |
Embed this result
A live badge for this use case. It links back here and updates as new runs are published.
Get new runs and ranking changes weekly
Which models got better or cheaper on real tasks like this one.