Claude Haiku 5.5 (effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) on Implement npm-style semver range matching (caret/tilde/x/hyphen, prerelease rule) from a written spec
AClaude Haiku 5.5default · thinking on · Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p) · cloud · 2026-10-17 · by @bobsiopener
- Estimated cost
- $0.03
- Wall time
- 2m
- Human step-ins
- 0
- Outcome
- Pass
Compare with other models on this task →
Summary
Exact prompt
# Task: implement semver range matching Implement `compare`, `satisfies` and `max_satisfying` in `semrange.py` following `RANGES.md` exactly (it is a subset of npm's node-semver semantics; prerelease handling is graded). Python standard library only; no third-party packages, no network. Add tests if you want.
Desugaring partial versions with implicit -0 upper bounds, caret on 0.x/0.0.x, hyphen ranges with partial ends, and the same-tuple prerelease rule are classic places where implementations diverge from npm. Original benchmark task written for usecaserank.com (not based on a specific public post). Headless, offline run on a reproducible fixture. Each run's notes say how its cost was measured (estimates are marked).
Success criteria: 1. All 49 hidden unittest cases pass (60 s cap): 46 satisfies() vectors, compare() precedence incl. prerelease ordering and build metadata, ValueError on invalid versions/ranges, max_satisfying() incl. skipping invalid strings and returning the original string.
Setup notes: Use Case Scout batch 5 case e11-semver-ranges (offline fixture). Prepared with batch5/prepare.sh; hidden key/tests kept outside the agent's work dir. Prompt = TASK.md verbatim. Scored with the scout's scorer: `python score.py WORKDIR KEYDIR`. Tools: Read/Write/Edit/Glob/Grep/Bash, web disabled. Single run, no retries. Rescored 2026-10-16 with Scout's fixed scorer (see batch5/CHANGES-2026-10-17.md). The original score was 48/49, and the model's output is unchanged. Claude Code's own reported cost for claude-haiku-5.5: $0.031441. Score: 49/49. Cost is an ESTIMATE: measured tokens x pricing.json list price (Claude Pro subscription, nothing billed); input_tokens include cache reads and writes. Single run.
Estimated cost List-price estimate; not actually billed.
Metrics
- Estimated cost
- $0.03
- Wall time
- 2m
- Human step-ins
- 0
- Turns
- 14
| Model | Input tok | Output tok | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| AClaude Haiku 5.5anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on | 634,673 | 33,497 | $0.03 |
Reproduce this run
- Use the use case prompt on the use case page.
- Same setup: Claude Haiku 5.5 (anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5, effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) via
Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p), cloud. - It counts as a success only if it meets every success criterion: 1. All 49 hidden unittest cases pass (60 s cap): 46 satisfies() vectors, compare() precedence incl. prerelease ordering and build metadata, ValueError on invalid versions/ranges, max_satisfying() incl. skipping invalid strings and returning the original string.
- Log model, tokens, wall time, human step-ins and the evidence log, then submit it as a reproduction. A different model? Submit a head-to-head rerun.
How runs are scored: Methodology.
Was this useful?
Automated checks
Trust 80% comes from these checks (how Trust % works).
- Run date is not in the future : passed
- Model is in the dated pricing table : passed
- Cost recomputed from tokens matches : passed
- Cached tokens are consistent : passed
- Output throughput is plausible : passed
- Autonomy matches step-ins : passed
- Step-ins do not exceed turns : passed
- Retries agree with first-try result : passed
- Evidence log SHA-256 matches : passed
- Evidence log is substantial : passed
Evidence log
[
{
"duration_api_ms": 144581,
"stop_reason": "end_turn",
"session_id": "[REDACTED]",
"total_cost_usd": 0.03144065,
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 28,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 43910,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 590735,
"output_tokens": 33497,
"output_tokens_details": {
"thinking_tokens": 24611
},
"server_tool_use": {
"web_search_requests": 0,
"web_fetch_requests": 0
},
"service_tier": "standard",
"cache_creation": {
"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 43910,
"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0
},
"inference_geo": "global",
"iterations": [
{
"input_tokens": 2,
"output_tokens": 710,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 55786,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 663,
"cache_creation": {
"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0,
"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 663
},
"type": "message"
}
],
"speed": "standard",
"fallback_credit": null
},
"modelUsage": {
"claude-haiku-5-5": {
"inputTokens": 28,
"outputTokens": 33497,
"cacheReadInputTokens": 590735,
"cacheCreationInputTokens": 43910,
"webSearchRequests": 0,
"costUSD": 0.03144065,
"contextWindow": 1000000,
"maxOutputTokens": 128000,
"thinkingTokens": 24611,
"canonicalModel": "claude-haiku-5-5",
"provider": "firstParty",
"costBasis": "list"
}
},
"permission_denials": [],
"terminal_reason": "completed",
"fast_mode_state": "off",
"fast_mode_disabled_reason": "sdk_opt_in_required",
"subagent_stats": {
"spawned": 0,
"requested": {
"background": 0,
"foreground": 0,
"unset": 0
},
"started_in_background": 0,
"max_depth": 0,
"spawned_by_subagents": 0,
"completed": 0,
"failed": 0,
"killed": {
"parent": 0,
"user": 0,
"system": 0
},
"refused": {
"depth_limit": 0,
"concurrency_limit": 0,
"budget": 0
},
"by_type": {}
},
"safety_stops": 0,
"is_error": false,
"num_turns": 14,
"subtype": "success",
"api_error_status": null,
"result": "I implemented `compare`, `satisfies` and `max_satisfying` in `semrange.py` following `RANGES.md`. The 21 tests I wrote in `test_semrange.py` pass (`python3 -m unittest test_semrange`). They cover the spec's examples, including the prerelease cases. Standard library only.\n\nThe approach: each version becomes a sortable key tuple, and each range comparator is desugared into plain `>=`, `<`, `<=`, `>`, `=` bounds. Comparators the user wrote with a prerelease are flagged, and the flag decides the prerelease rule. Implicit `-0` upper bounds are not flagged, as the spec requires.\n\nJudgment calls where the spec was silent or ambiguous:\n\n- **Empty `||` alternative** (e.g. `1.0.0 ||`) is treated as `*`, matching npm. Say if you want it to raise `ValueError` instead.\n- **`max_satisfying` raises `ValueError`** if any version string is invalid, rather than skipping it as npm does. This follows the general \"invalid version \u2192 ValueError\" rule.\n- **Strict version syntax:** no surrounding whitespace in versions, leading zeros rejected, and only one `v` or `=` prefix. `~>` is rejected.\n- **Partial versions** with a wildcard followed by a number (`1.x.3`) and prereleases on partials (`1.2-beta`) raise `ValueError`.\n- **Whitespace** is allowed between an operator and its version, and also between `~`/`^` and their version (npm does this too).\n\nNo git repository here, so nothing was committed.",
"ttft_ms": 1187,
"type": "result",
"duration_ms": 145307,
"uuid": "[REDACTED]",
"ttft_stream_ms": 940,
"time_to_request_ms": 199,
"first_content_frame_ms": 940,
"queued_turn_count": 0,
"result_index": 0
}
]