Skip to content

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) on Fix a multi-currency brokerage ledger codebase with interacting planted bugs

AClaude Sonnet 5.5default · thinking on · Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p) · cloud · 2026-10-20 · by @bobsiopener

Trust 80%Fully autonomouspartial · 0 retriesSuperseded
Estimated cost
$0.13
Wall time
46s
Human step-ins
0
Outcome
Partial

Compare with other models on this task →

Superseded. This run was rescored on 2026-10-22 and replaced by a newer run. It no longer counts toward rankings, use-case tables or the data export; it is kept here for the record.

Summary

Exact prompt

# Fix the multi-currency brokerage ledger The working directory contains a small ledger codebase (`solve.py` and the `ledger/` package, about 290 lines) plus sample inputs. Its output does not follow the specification below: **several bugs are planted, and some interact**. Fix the code (you may restructure it freely, Python 3 standard library only) so that `python solve.py input.json answer.json` follows this specification exactly. Hidden checks also run it on freshly generated inputs. ## Inputs `input.json`: `base` (base currency), `as_of` (valuation date), file names for `transactions`, `rates`, `prices`. CSV files may start with a UTF-8 BOM, contain `#` comment lines and blank lines (ignored), padded header names (case-insensitive) and quoted fields with commas. Transaction rows are numbered from 0 = first data row after the header, counting only non-comment, non-blank rows (`line`). - `rates.csv` `date,currency,rate`: units of base per 1 unit of currency. Not every currency has a rate every day. - `prices.csv` `date,symbol,close,currency`. - `transactions.csv` `date,type,account,amount,currency,symbol,qty,memo`. ## Rules 1. All money is exact decimal (no binary floats in calculations). "Round" means to 0.01, **half away from zero for .5 cases (ROUND_HALF_UP)**. 2. FX rate for (currency, date) = the rate with the latest date **on or before** that date (a rate dated exactly that day counts). The base currency's rate is always 1. No such rate means none. 3. Numbers: surrounding spaces and `_` are ignored; `(x)` means -x. A non-number in amount/qty -> reject `bad_number`. Empty amount/qty = 0. Empty currency = base. 4. Validation order per row, first failure wins: unknown type (case-insensitive DEPOSIT, WITHDRAW, TRANSFER, BUY, SELL, DIV, FEE) -> `bad_type`; empty account -> `bad_account`; `bad_number`; amount or qty < 0 -> `negative_value`; no FX rate for the row's currency on its date -> `no_rate`. Then the type-specific checks below. A rejected row changes nothing. Rejects are `{"line", "reason"}` in file order; `applied` counts rows not rejected. 5. Cash is kept per account **per currency** (never converted). 6. DEPOSIT adds cash. WITHDRAW: needs cash in that currency >= amount, else `insufficient_cash`. 7. TRANSFER: memo must be `to:<account>` (prefix case-insensitive, account trimmed, non-empty, different from the source) else `bad_transfer`; needs cash >= amount else `insufficient_cash`; moves the amount **in the same currency** to the destination account (which is created if new). 8. BUY: symbol (upper-cased) non-empty and qty > 0 else `bad_trade`; needs cash >= amount else `insufficient_cash`; pays `amount` (total cost) in the row currency; adds a lot of qty with cost basis = round(amount * rate on the trade date) in base. 9. SELL: symbol/qty as BUY (`bad_trade`); held qty in that account must be >= qty else `insufficient_qty`. Lots are relieved **FIFO** (oldest first). A fully used lot relieves its whole remaining cost; a partly used lot relieves round(lot_cost * take / lot_qty) and keeps the rest (so cost always sums exactly). Proceeds in base = round(amount * rate); realized gain += proceeds - relieved cost. Cash += amount in the row currency. 10. DIV: cash += amount; income += round(amount * rate). FEE: cash -= amount (may go negative); income -= round(amount * rate). 11. Valuation at `as_of`: each holding (qty > 0) uses the last close on or before `as_of` in its quote currency; value_base = round(qty * close * rate(currency, as_of)), or null if no price. Cash in base = sum over currencies of round(balance * rate(currency, as_of)). total_value_base = round(cash in base + sum of holding values). grand_total_base = sum of account totals. ## answer.json `{"accounts": {account: {"cash": {ccy: balance (non-zero only, sorted)}, "holdings": {SYMBOL: {"qty", "cost_base", "value_base"}} (qty > 0 only), "realized_base", "income_base", "total_value_base"}}, "rejects": [...], "applied": n, "grand_total_base"}`. Accounts are every account that ever had cash, lots, gains or income. Money is written as a JSON number with 2 decimals. ## Scoring Hidden checks (partial credit = fraction passed; all must pass): `rejects_and_applied`, `cash_balances`, `holdings_quantities`, `cost_basis`, `realized_gains`, `income`, `valuation` (account totals and grand total) on the given input; `fresh_run_1`, `fresh_run_2` (the whole answer) on fresh inputs. All values exact. 30-second limit per run.

Each bug is plausible code; several masks another (wrong rate date changes the same totals as rounding). Fixing only the obvious ones leaves every money total wrong. Original benchmark task written for usecaserank.com (not based on a specific public post). Headless, offline run on a reproducible fixture. Each run's notes say how its cost was measured (estimates are marked).

Success criteria: 1. rejects_and_applied 2. cash_balances 3. holdings_quantities 4. cost_basis 5. realized_gains 6. income 7. valuation 8. fresh_run_1 9. fresh_run_2

Setup notes: Use Case Scout batch 12 case m01-ledger-debug (offline, synthetic fixture). Prepared with batch12/prepare.sh; hidden key/checker kept outside the agent's work dir (temp dir during the run). Prompt = TASK.md verbatim. Scored with the case's scorer: `python score.py WORKDIR KEYDIR` (python3, run from the case dir). Tools: Read/Write/Edit/Glob/Grep/Bash, web disabled. Single run, no retries. 1-min load average at scoring 0.11 (8 cores). Claude Code's own reported cost for claude-sonnet-5.5: $0.131591. Score: 6/9. Cost is an ESTIMATE: measured tokens x pricing.json list price (Claude Pro subscription, nothing billed); input_tokens include cache reads and writes. Single run.

Estimated cost List-price estimate; not actually billed.

Metrics

Estimated cost
$0.13
Wall time
46s
Human step-ins
0
Turns
5
Model usage
ModelInput tokOutput tokCost
AClaude Sonnet 5.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on129,9415,197$0.13

Reproduce this run

  1. Use the use case prompt on the use case page.
  2. Same setup: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5, effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) via Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p), cloud.
  3. It counts as a success only if it meets every success criterion: 1. rejects_and_applied 2. cash_balances 3. holdings_quantities 4. cost_basis 5. realized_gains 6. income 7. valuation 8. fresh_run_1 9. fresh_run_2
  4. Log model, tokens, wall time, human step-ins and the evidence log, then submit it as a reproduction. A different model? Submit a head-to-head rerun.

How runs are scored: Methodology.

Was this useful?

⇄ Rerun on another model

Automated checks

Trust 80% comes from these checks (how Trust % works).

Evidence log
[
 {
  "duration_api_ms": 45027,
  "stop_reason": "end_turn",
  "session_id": "[REDACTED]",
  "total_cost_usd": 0.1315912,
  "usage": {
   "input_tokens": 10,
   "cache_creation_input_tokens": 17079,
   "cache_read_input_tokens": 112852,
   "output_tokens": 5197,
   "output_tokens_details": {
    "thinking_tokens": 1478
   },
   "server_tool_use": {
    "web_search_requests": 0,
    "web_fetch_requests": 0
   },
   "service_tier": "standard",
   "cache_creation": {
    "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 17079,
    "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0
   },
   "inference_geo": "global",
   "iterations": [
    {
     "input_tokens": 2,
     "output_tokens": 680,
     "cache_read_input_tokens": 29169,
     "cache_creation_input_tokens": 449,
     "cache_creation": {
      "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0,
      "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 449
     },
     "type": "message"
    }
   ],
   "speed": "standard",
   "fallback_credit": null
  },
  "modelUsage": {
   "claude-sonnet-5-5": {
    "inputTokens": 10,
    "outputTokens": 5197,
    "cacheReadInputTokens": 112852,
    "cacheCreationInputTokens": 17079,
    "webSearchRequests": 0,
    "costUSD": 0.1315912,
    "contextWindow": 1000000,
    "maxOutputTokens": 128000,
    "thinkingTokens": 1478,
    "canonicalModel": "claude-sonnet-5-5",
    "provider": "firstParty",
    "costBasis": "list"
   }
  },
  "permission_denials": [],
  "terminal_reason": "completed",
  "fast_mode_state": "off",
  "fast_mode_disabled_reason": "sdk_opt_in_required",
  "subagent_stats": {
   "spawned": 0,
   "requested": {
    "background": 0,
    "foreground": 0,
    "unset": 0
   },
   "started_in_background": 0,
   "max_depth": 0,
   "spawned_by_subagents": 0,
   "completed": 0,
   "failed": 0,
   "killed": {
    "parent": 0,
    "user": 0,
    "system": 0
   },
   "refused": {
    "depth_limit": 0,
    "concurrency_limit": 0,
    "budget": 0
   },
   "by_type": {}
  },
  "safety_stops": 0,
  "is_error": false,
  "num_turns": 5,
  "subtype": "success",
  "api_error_status": null,
  "result": "I fixed the planted bugs, and `python3 solve.py input.json answer.json` now runs cleanly on the sample input. I could only check that it runs and that the output looks sensible. I had no expected output to compare against, so I haven't confirmed it matches the hidden checks. The sample run gives 106 applied rows, a grand total of 78774.99 and several rejects. The command is `python3` because this machine has no `python`.\n\n**Bugs fixed:**\n- **Row numbering:** reject `line` numbers were off by one, because the header was counted as row 0. Rows now start at 0 after the header.\n- **Rounding:** `q2` used half-even rounding; it is now half-up.\n- **FX lookup:** the rate lookup skipped a rate dated exactly on the day. It now uses the latest rate on or before the date.\n- **FIFO:** lots were relieved newest-first. They are now relieved oldest-first.\n- **Transfers:** a transfer credited the destination in base currency, converted at the rate. It now moves the same amount in the same currency.\n- **Trade quantity:** BUY and SELL rejected only `qty == 0` as `bad_trade`. They now reject `qty <= 0`.\n- **Number parsing:** `NaN` and `Infinity` were accepted as numbers. They are now `bad_number`, and `( 5 )` with inner spaces parses as -5.\n- **Phantom accounts:** reading a balance for a rejected row created an empty account entry. Reads no longer create anything.\n- **Duplicate rates and prices:** the sort could reorder two rows with the same date by their values. It now keeps file order, so the later row wins.\n- **Output:** money is now written as exact 2-decimal JSON numbers (e.g. `268.60`) instead of floats. Quantities are written exactly.\n\n**Two guesses where the spec is silent:**\n- If a holding's price currency has no rate at `as_of`, its `value_base` is `null`.\n- If a cash currency has no rate at `as_of`, it counts as 0 in the account total.",
  "ttft_ms": 2758,
  "type": "result",
  "duration_ms": 45486,
  "uuid": "[REDACTED]",
  "ttft_stream_ms": 1819,
  "time_to_request_ms": 274,
  "first_content_frame_ms": 1820,
  "queued_turn_count": 0,
  "result_index": 0
 }
]

Get new runs and ranking changes weekly