GPT-6.1 Sol (effort default (no reasoning-effort override) · thinking on) on Q1 budget-vs-actual variance table and CFO memo from a raw ledger (out-of-period lines, intercompany, legacy codes, reversals)
OGPT-6.1 Soldefault · thinking on · Codex CLI 0.163.0 (codex exec --json) · cloud · 2026-10-22 · by @bobsiopener
- Estimated cost
- $0.07
- Wall time
- 58s
- Human step-ins
- 0
- Outcome
- Pass
Compare with other models on this task →
Summary
Exact prompt
# Task: Q1 budget variance report and memo Finance needs a Q1 2026 budget-vs-actual review. You have `budget.csv` (Q1 budget per department), `ledger.csv` (raw expense lines) and `dept_remap.csv` (legacy department codes still used by some systems). Produce `variance.csv` and `memo.md` in this directory. You may use any method (script or by hand). No network. ## Rules for actuals 1. Only ledger lines dated 2026-01-01 to 2026-03-31 inclusive count; lines dated outside Q1 are excluded whatever their memo says. 2. Lines whose `account` starts with `9` are intercompany transfers and are excluded. 3. A `dept_code` listed as a `legacy_code` in `dept_remap.csv` belongs to the mapped `dept_code`. 4. Amounts may contain thousands separators; an amount in parentheses, e.g. `(1,250.00)`, is negative (a reversal/credit) and reduces the total. ## variance.csv 5. Header `dept_code,budget,actual,variance,variance_pct`, one row per department in `budget.csv`, sorted by `dept_code`. 6. `variance = actual - budget` (positive = overspent). `variance_pct = variance / budget x 100`, rounded half-up to 1 decimal. Money columns with exactly 2 decimals; no `$`, `%` or thousands separators; negative numbers with a leading `-`. Every value must equal the exact result rounded as stated. ## memo.md 7. At most 200 words (counted as whitespace-separated tokens), written for the CFO. 8. It must name the three departments with the highest positive `variance_pct` using their `dept_name` from `budget.csv`, and the first mention of each of those three names must appear in descending order of overspend. Each of the three must be accompanied somewhere in the memo by its percentage written with a sign and one decimal followed by `%`, e.g. `+16.4%`. 9. It must also name the department with the lowest (most negative) `variance_pct` and give its percentage in the same format, e.g. `-7.2%`. 10. Optional (reported, not scored): a line starting with `Recommendation:`. The grader compares `variance.csv` with the correct values and checks `memo.md` against rules 7-9.
Each department has an out-of-period accrual, an intercompany line and a reversal pair; three departments use legacy codes. Missing any rule changes the variance table and usually the top-3 ranking the memo must report. Original benchmark task written for usecaserank.com. Headless, offline run on a reproducible fixture. Cost shown is a list-price API-equivalent estimate (run on a ChatGPT subscription, not billed).
Success criteria: 1. variance_csv_correct: all 8 rows exact (2-decimal money, 1-decimal pct). 2. memo_word_limit: 1-200 whitespace tokens. 3. memo_top3_in_order: the three largest overspenders named in descending order, each with its signed percentage. 4. memo_names_largest_underspend: the largest underspender named with its signed percentage.
Setup notes: Use Case Scout batch7 case g08-budget-variance-memo (offline fixture). Prepared with batch7/prepare.sh on the shared box; only TASK.md + starting files were copied to the agent machine, hidden key/tests stayed on the box. Prompt = TASK.md verbatim on stdin. Flags: --json -s workspace-write --skip-git-repo-check --ephemeral --ignore-user-config --ignore-rules -C <workdir>. Scored on the box with the scout's scorer: `python score.py WORKDIR KEYDIR`. Single run, no retries. User-level AGENTS.md (846 bytes, sha256 83ec4fe50da8) may have been in context; --ignore-user-config does not document excluding it. Serving model not confirmed: requested via -m; the event log does not echo the serving model id. Price source is secondary (pricing.json verification='secondary', https://www.actuia.com/en/news/ai-api-pricing-in-october-2026-050-to-50-for-output/), not an official OpenAI price page. Score: 4/4 checks. Cost is an ESTIMATE: measured tokens x pricing.json list price (ChatGPT plan, nothing billed); input_tokens include cached reads; output_tokens include reasoning tokens. Tool calls 4 (1 failed, recovered). Single run.
Estimated cost List-price estimate; not actually billed.
Metrics
- Estimated cost
- $0.07
- Wall time
- 58s
- Human step-ins
- 0
- Turns
- 1
| Model | Input tok | Output tok | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| OGPT-6.1 Solopenai/gpt-6.1-soleffort default (no reasoning-effort override) · thinking on | 95,866 | 2,027 | $0.07 |
Reproduce this run
- Use the use case prompt on the use case page.
- Same setup: GPT-6.1 Sol (openai/gpt-6.1-sol, effort default (no reasoning-effort override) · thinking on) via
Codex CLI 0.163.0 (codex exec --json), cloud. - It counts as a success only if it meets every success criterion: 1. variance_csv_correct: all 8 rows exact (2-decimal money, 1-decimal pct). 2. memo_word_limit: 1-200 whitespace tokens. 3. memo_top3_in_order: the three largest overspenders named in descending order, each with its signed percentage. 4. memo_names_largest_underspend: the largest underspender named with its signed percentage.
- Log model, tokens, wall time, human step-ins and the evidence log, then submit it as a reproduction. A different model? Submit a head-to-head rerun.
How runs are scored: Methodology.
Was this useful?
Automated checks
Trust 80% comes from these checks (how Trust % works).
- Run date is not in the future : passed
- Model is in the dated pricing table : passed
- Cost recomputed from tokens matches : passed
- Cached tokens are consistent : passed
- Output throughput is plausible : passed
- Autonomy matches step-ins : passed
- Step-ins do not exceed turns : passed
- Retries agree with first-try result : passed
- Evidence log SHA-256 matches : passed
- Evidence log is substantial : passed
Evidence log
{"type": "thread.started", "thread_id": "01a1644a-3200-7ee1-942b-9eab6c51a6fd"}
{"type": "turn.started"}
{"type": "item.completed", "item": {"id": "item_0", "type": "agent_message", "text": "I\u2019ll calculate Q1 actuals using the exclusions and department mappings, then write and verify both files.\n"}}
{"type": "item.started", "item": {"id": "item_1", "type": "command_execution", "command": "/bin/bash -lc \"pwd && rg --files -g 'AGENTS.md' -g '*.csv' -g 'memo.md'\"", "aggregated_output": "", "exit_code": null, "status": "in_progress"}}
{"type": "item.completed", "item": {"id": "item_1", "type": "command_execution", "command": "/bin/bash -lc \"pwd && rg --files -g 'AGENTS.md' -g '*.csv' -g 'memo.md'\"", "aggregated_output": "/home/bob/usecase-runs/batch/out/gpt-6.1-sol/187_g08/work\nledger.csv\ndept_remap.csv\nbudget.csv\n", "exit_code": 0, "status": "completed"}}
{"type": "item.started", "item": {"id": "item_2", "type": "command_execution", "command": "/bin/bash -lc 'cat budget.csv dept_remap.csv ledger.csv'", "aggregated_output": "", "exit_code": null, "status": "in_progress"}}
{"type": "item.completed", "item": {"id": "item_2", "type": "command_execution", "command": "/bin/bash -lc 'cat budget.csv dept_remap.csv ledger.csv'", "aggregated_output": "dept_code,dept_name,q1_budget\r\nENG,Engineering,420000.00\r\nMKT,Marketing,180000.00\r\nSAL,Sales,260000.00\r\nSUP,Customer Support,95000.00\r\nFIN,Finance,70000.00\r\nHR,People Operations,60000.00\r\nOPS,Operations,140000.00\r\nLEG,Legal,45000.00\r\nlegacy_code,dept_code\r\nMKT-OLD,MKT\r\nCS,SUP\r\nPEOPLE,HR\r\ndate,account,dept_code,amount,memo\r\n2026-01-23,6400,HR,\"4,980.59\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-02-09,9100,FIN,\"5,833.33\",intercompany transfer\r\n2026-02-24,5200,SAL,\"16,434.75\",accrual\r\n2026-02-14,6100,LEG,1709.90,travel\r\n2026-01-21,6400,OPS,\"4,046.00\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-01-03,6100,MKT-OLD,15239.03,contractor\r\n2026-03-11,7000,ENG,\"18,562.36\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-03-03,5100,SAL,\"14,048.48\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-02-07,9100,MKT,15000.00,intercompany transfer\r\n2026-02-08,5200,PEOPLE,2783.14,vendor invoice\r\n2026-01-15,5200,ENG,20100.69,accrual\r\n2026-02-02,5100,SAL,\"14,805.59\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-02-18,5100,FIN,\"2,074.14\",accrual\r\n2026-03-06,6400,MKT,12449.55,travel\r\n2026-02-03,7000,ENG,\"28,705.05\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-03-04,7000,SAL,\"8,042.67\",contractor\r\n2026-02-07,9100,ENG,\"35,000.00\",intercompany transfer\r\n2026-03-22,6100,HR,\"3,021.43\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-01-27,5100,HR,\"5,090.46\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-03-08,6400,MKT-OLD,11819.34,accrual\r\n2026-02-03,6100,SUP,\"4,799.89\",travel\r\n2026-04-03,6100,SAL,\"10,400.00\",accrual\r\n2026-04-03,6100,LEG,\"1,800.00\",accrual\r\n2026-02-01,5200,MKT,\"8,445.17\",contractor\r\n2026-02-13,5200,MKT,\"39,396.77\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-03-13,6100,ENG,\"23,162.04\",accrual\r\n2026-03-22,6100,LEG,1662.89,vendor invoice\r\n2026-03-21,5100,ENG,\"21,929.74\",accrual\r\n2026-02-07,5100,OPS,6836.27,travel\r\n2026-04-01,6100,SUP,\"3,800.00\",accrual\r\n2026-01-21,6100,OPS,\"5,094.80\",software\r\n2026-04-03,6100,HR,2400.00,accrual\r\n2026-03-05,5200,SUP,9165.75,travel\r\n2026-03-07,5200,SUP,\"4,389.93\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-02-11,5100,FIN,2429.77,payroll alloc\r\n2026-03-17,6100,LEG,\"(1,570.50)\",software\r\n2026-02-20,7000,SAL,(8042.67),payroll alloc\r\n2026-02-27,7000,MKT,\"6,984.00\",software\r\n2026-02-01,5200,CS,3035.15,vendor invoice\r\n2026-03-17,5200,FIN,2801.63,software\r\n2026-02-19,6100,SUP,5050.35,accrual\r\n2026-02-21,5200,FIN,3322.32,vendor invoice\r\n2026-03-04,5200,LEG,\"1,772.49\",travel\r\n2026-03-04,6100,LEG,\"2,736.41\",contractor\r\n2026-02-04,6400,FIN,\"3,039.00\",travel\r\n2026-01-11,7000,LEG,\"2,069.64\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-01-25,7000,ENG,\"27,545.07\",travel\r\n2026-02-19,6400,LEG,\"2,919.85\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-03-07,6100,CS,5721.94,payroll alloc\r\n2026-01-07,5200,OPS,3874.53,payroll alloc\r\n2026-01-08,5200,SAL,\"14,610.19\",vendor invoice\r\n2025-12-31,6100,ENG,\"16,800.00\",accrual\r\n2026-02-13,6100,OPS,8244.56,travel\r\n2026-01-21,6100,HR,3701.07,vendor invoice\r\n2026-01-25,7000,FIN,\"2,770.38\",accrual\r\n2026-02-06,5200,LEG,\"1,695.24\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-02-15,5200,SUP,\"4,499.84\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-02-16,5100,MKT-OLD,\"12,158.82\",accrual\r\n2026-03-18,7000,ENG,25137.51,travel\r\n2026-01-28,6400,MKT,\"14,511.14\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-01-22,6100,FIN,\"2,632.11\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-03-24,5200,ENG,16035.39,contractor\r\n2026-02-26,9100,HR,5000.00,intercompany transfer\r\n2026-02-01,6100,FIN,\"(2,284.33)\",travel\r\n2026-03-02,6100,SUP,5065.32,payroll alloc\r\n2026-02-25,5200,LEG,2071.17,travel\r\n2026-02-07,5200,FIN,\"3,082.45\",accrual\r\n2025-12-30,6100,HR,2400.00,accrual\r\n2026-02-18,9100,OPS,\"11,666.67\",intercompany transfer\r\n2026-02-20,7000,MKT,\"15,890.94\",contractor\r\n2026-03-01,5100,SAL,\"13,281.14\",software\r\n2026-03-13,6400,CS,\"5,145.13\",travel\r\n2026-01-01,7000,FIN,\"2,565.73\",contractor\r\n2026-02-11,6400,LEG,2023.80,travel\r\n2026-03-01,7000,SAL,\"17,021.79\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-01-18,7000,HR,3126.15,travel\r\n2025-12-31,6100,OPS,5600.00,accrual\r\n2026-01-16,6100,LEG,\"1,714.09\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-02-10,7000,ENG,(14434.00),travel\r\n2026-02-09,5100,MKT-OLD,11131.79,vendor invoice\r\n2026-01-01,5100,HR,\"2,534.54\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-02-21,5100,SUP,(3540.33),vendor invoice\r\n2026-02-20,6400,FIN,3056.32,software\r\n2026-01-09,5100,FIN,4227.21,payroll alloc\r\n2026-01-20,5100,LEG,\"2,454.76\",software\r\n2026-03-20,7000,LEG,2165.87,vendor invoice\r\n2026-03-26,6100,OPS,\"6,661.37\",contractor\r\n2026-03-21,5100,SUP,\"5,471.38\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-03-03,7000,CS,3540.33,accrual\r\n2026-03-18,6100,ENG,\"14,434.00\",travel\r\n2026-03-07,7000,ENG,17009.58,contractor\r\n2026-03-13,5200,OPS,\"6,980.46\",travel\r\n2026-03-04,6100,FIN,4194.97,travel\r\n2026-02-27,7000,MKT-OLD,\"12,380.06\",software\r\n2026-03-08,6100,SUP,\"3,177.87\",software\r\n2026-01-05,5200,SAL,17375.02,software\r\n2026-03-25,5100,FIN,2945.76,accrual\r\n2026-01-16,5200,MKT,\"13,965.54\",travel\r\n2026-03-13,6100,LEG,1979.73,payroll alloc\r\n2026-03-09,5200,OPS,\"7,990.52\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-02-10,9100,SAL,21666.67,intercompany transfer\r\n2026-01-08,5200,SAL,\"8,903.84\",software\r\n2026-03-27,7000,OPS,\"12,101.84\",accrual\r\n2026-04-03,6100,ENG,16800.00,accrual\r\n2026-02-11,7000,CS,5803.84,payroll alloc\r\n2026-03-13,5100,LEG,\"3,715.11\",software\r\n2026-02-09,9100,LEG,3750.00,intercompany transfer\r\n2026-03-27,5200,FIN,\"2,095.27\",software\r\n2026-01-20,5200,PEOPLE,\"4,807.83\",accrual\r\n2026-03-11,7000,FIN,\"4,542.93\",contractor\r\n2026-04-01,6100,MKT,7200.00,accrual\r\n2026-02-23,7000,SAL,14834.45,vendor invoice\r\n2026-02-23,5100,FIN,\"4,113.71\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-04-03,6100,OPS,\"5,600.00\",accrual\r\n2026-02-06,7000,HR,4351.90,contractor\r\n2026-04-01,6100,MKT,7200.00,accrual\r\n2026-03-04,7000,FIN,2618.15,payroll alloc\r\n2026-02-21,6100,PEOPLE,2739.88,accrual\r\n2026-03-27,5100,MKT,\"12,259.13\",contractor\r\n2026-03-14,5200,HR,2795.78,contractor\r\n2026-02-06,5200,SAL,19570.90,accrual\r\n2026-02-08,9100,SUP,\"7,916.67\",intercompany transfer\r\n2026-01-23,5200,OPS,\"7,067.18\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-01-06,7000,ENG,27856.04,software\r\n2026-01-12,5100,OPS,3909.55,software\r\n2026-01-25,7000,LEG,\"1,356.66\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-01-04,5100,OPS,\"7,061.45\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-02-12,5100,HR,\"2,391.61\",contractor\r\n2026-03-04,6400,SUP,\"6,904.05\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-04-01,6100,SAL,\"10,400.00\",accrual\r\n2026-01-25,7000,SAL,\"16,343.19\",software\r\n2026-03-11,6400,MKT,(6984.00),software\r\n2026-03-08,7000,ENG,27532.29,contractor\r\n2026-01-28,7000,LEG,\"2,444.66\",contractor\r\n2026-03-06,5200,SUP,5347.93,software\r\n2026-02-11,6400,SUP,\"5,694.11\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-02-10,5100,SAL,\"15,428.22\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-03-07,6100,OPS,\"4,648.59\",accrual\r\n2026-01-25,5200,LEG,\"1,570.50\",travel\r\n2026-01-04,5200,ENG,24244.13,software\r\n2026-02-23,7000,FIN,\"3,010.49\",contractor\r\n2026-01-22,6400,FIN,\"6,509.21\",travel\r\n2026-03-03,5100,LEG,\"1,595.33\",accrual\r\n2026-03-28,6400,LEG,\"2,676.83\",vendor invoice\r\n2025-12-31,6100,SUP,3800.00,accrual\r\n2026-03-21,7000,MKT,\"9,003.08\",travel\r\n2026-02-01,6100,FIN,3108.30,vendor invoice\r\n2026-02-22,5200,LEG,2416.41,accrual\r\n2026-02-05,6100,PEOPLE,\"2,178.00\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-01-20,6100,SUP,\"3,428.05\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-01-04,7000,PEOPLE,(2178.00),payroll alloc\r\n2026-03-02,5200,SAL,11525.87,contractor\r\n2026-01-04,6100,FIN,2284.33,software\r\n2026-03-11,6100,SAL,18884.32,payroll alloc\r\n2026-03-14,7000,ENG,26455.07,travel\r\n2026-01-11,6100,LEG,\"2,298.49\",accrual\r\n2025-12-31,6100,FIN,2800.00,accrual\r\n2026-01-14,5200,OPS,6285.45,travel\r\n2026-01-12,5100,CS,3531.98,travel\r\n2026-03-10,6400,SAL,\"18,552.81\",travel\r\n2026-02-14,5100,OPS,\"3,916.36\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-03-24,5200,LEG,1890.44,contractor\r\n2026-02-14,6400,PEOPLE,5592.83,contractor\r\n2026-02-06,5100,OPS,7402.50,accrual\r\n2026-03-26,7000,ENG,24515.61,accrual\r\n2025-12-30,6100,FIN,2800.00,accrual\r\n2026-04-01,6100,LEG,1800.00,accrual\r\n2026-01-01,7000,ENG,\"4,459.14\",software\r\n2026-02-17,7000,OPS,4588.33,vendor invoice\r\n2026-03-17,5100,ENG,\"18,856.93\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-03-26,5200,LEG,\"1,745.23\",contractor\r\n2026-02-04,6400,SAL,\"(2,909.94)\",software\r\n2026-02-02,6100,SUP,5605.71,accrual\r\n2026-02-26,6100,MKT,11363.61,payroll alloc\r\n2026-02-14,7000,OPS,5117.07,travel\r\n2026-03-16,6100,MKT,\"9,506.03\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-02-03,5200,HR,4744.59,contractor\r\n2026-02-01,5200,PEOPLE,4957.02,accrual\r\n2026-02-25,6100,FIN,3390.15,contractor\r\n2026-03-16,6100,OPS,7772.69,payroll alloc\r\n2026-01-14,7000,OPS,\"(4,046.00)\",travel\r\n2026-01-23,6100,HR,3270.29,vendor invoice\r\n2026-01-26,5200,ENG,\"29,683.55\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-01-03,7000,CS,4672.19,contractor\r\n2026-01-11,5200,PEOPLE,\"4,450.89\",vendor invoice\r\n2026-03-25,5200,SAL,\"12,569.38\",software\r\n2026-03-20,6100,ENG,\"30,485.01\",payroll alloc\r\n2026-01-26,7000,OPS,\"5,826.48\",contractor\r\n2026-02-18,5100,SUP,4816.04,accrual\r\n2026-03-13,6400,SUP,4883.55,vendor invoice\r\n2026-02-20,7000,ENG,\"20,744.80\",accrual\r\n", "exit_code": 0, "status": "completed"}}
{"type": "item.started", "item": {"id": "item_3", "type": "command_execution", "command": "/bin/bash -lc \"python - <<'PY'\nimport csv\nfrom decimal import Decimal, ROUND_HALF_UP\nfrom datetime import date\nfrom pathlib import Path\nD=Decimal\nwith open('budget.csv', newline='') as f: budgets={r['dept_code']:(r['dept_name'],D(r['q1_budget'])) for r in csv.DictReader(f)}\nwith open('dept_remap.csv', newline='') as f: remap={r['legacy_code']:r['dept_code'] for r in csv.DictReader(f)}\nactual={k:D(0) for k in budgets}\ncounts={'included':0,'outside_q1':0,'intercompany':0}\nwith open('ledger.csv',newline='') as f:\n for r in csv.DictReader(f):\n if not date(2026,1,1)<=date.fromisoformat(r['date'])<=date(2026,3,31): counts['outside_q1']+=1; continue\n if r['account'].startswith('9'): counts['intercompany']+=1; continue\n dept=remap.get(r['dept_code'],r['dept_code'])\n s=r['amount'].replace(',','').strip()\n amount=-D(s[1:-1]) if s.startswith('(') and s.endswith(')') else D(s)\n actual[dept]+=amount\n counts['included']+=1\nrows=[]\nfor code,(name,budget) in sorted(budgets.items()):\n variance=actual[code]-budget\n pct=(variance/budget*100).quantize(D('0.1'),rounding=ROUND_HALF_UP)\n rows.append((code,budget,actual[code],variance,pct))\nwith open('variance.csv','w',newline='') as f:\n w=csv.writer(f); w.writerow(['dept_code','budget','actual','variance','variance_pct'])\n for code,b,a,v,p in rows: w.writerow([code,f'{b:.2f}',f'{a:.2f}',f'{v:.2f}',f'{p:.1f}'])\nrank=sorted(rows,key=lambda r:r[3]/r[1],reverse=True)\ntop=[r for r in rank if r[3]>0][:3]; low=rank[-1]\nb=sum(r[1] for r in rows); a=sum(r[2] for r in rows); v=a-b\np=(v/b*100).quantize(D('.1'),rounding=ROUND_HALF_UP)\nmemo=f'''# Q1 2026 Budget Review\n\nTo: CFO\n\nThe largest percentage overspends were {budgets[top[0][0]][0]} ({top[0][4]:+.1f}%), {budgets[top[1][0]][0]} ({top[1][4]:+.1f}%), and {budgets[top[2][0]][0]} ({top[2][4]:+.1f}%), in descending order. {budgets[low[0]][0]} recorded the largest percentage underspend ({low[4]:+.1f}%).\n\nTotal Q1 expenses were \"'${a:,.2f} against a ${b:,.2f} budget, a ${abs(v):,.2f} {'\"'overspend' if v>0 else 'underspend'} ({p:+.1f}%). Actuals include only January 1\u2013March 31 ledger dates, exclude accounts starting with 9, consolidate legacy department codes, and deduct reversals and credits.\n\nRecommendation: Ask the three largest percentage overspend departments to explain their variances and propose corrective actions; confirm whether the largest underspend reflects timing or lasting savings.\n'''\nPath('memo.md').write_text(memo)\nassert len(memo.split())<=200\nwith open('variance.csv',newline='') as f:\n out=list(csv.DictReader(f))\nassert len(out)==len(budgets)\nfor r in out:\n code=r['dept_code']; budget=budgets[code][1]\n assert D(r['actual'])==actual[code]\n assert D(r['variance'])==actual[code]-budget\n assert D(r['variance_pct'])==((actual[code]-budget)/budget*100).quantize(D('.1'),rounding=ROUND_HALF_UP)\nprint(Path('variance.csv').read_text())\nprint(memo)\nprint('Verified:',counts,'; memo words:',len(memo.split()))\nPY\"", "aggregated_output": "", "exit_code": null, "status": "in_progress"}}
{"type": "item.completed", "item": {"id": "item_3", "type": "command_execution", "command": "/bin/bash -lc \"python - <<'PY'\nimport csv\nfrom decimal import Decimal, ROUND_HALF_UP\nfrom datetime import date\nfrom pathlib import Path\nD=Decimal\nwith open('budget.csv', newline='') as f: budgets={r['dept_code']:(r['dept_name'],D(r['q1_budget'])) for r in csv.DictReader(f)}\nwith open('dept_remap.csv', newline='') as f: remap={r['legacy_code']:r['dept_code'] for r in csv.DictReader(f)}\nactual={k:D(0) for k in budgets}\ncounts={'included':0,'outside_q1':0,'intercompany':0}\nwith open('ledger.csv',newline='') as f:\n for r in csv.DictReader(f):\n if not date(2026,1,1)<=date.fromisoformat(r['date'])<=date(2026,3,31): counts['outside_q1']+=1; continue\n if r['account'].startswith('9'): counts['intercompany']+=1; continue\n dept=remap.get(r['dept_code'],r['dept_code'])\n s=r['amount'].replace(',','').strip()\n amount=-D(s[1:-1]) if s.startswith('(') and s.endswith(')') else D(s)\n actual[dept]+=amount\n counts['included']+=1\nrows=[]\nfor code,(name,budget) in sorted(budgets.items()):\n variance=actual[code]-budget\n pct=(variance/budget*100).quantize(D('0.1'),rounding=ROUND_HALF_UP)\n rows.append((code,budget,actual[code],variance,pct))\nwith open('variance.csv','w',newline='') as f:\n w=csv.writer(f); w.writerow(['dept_code','budget','actual','variance','variance_pct'])\n for code,b,a,v,p in rows: w.writerow([code,f'{b:.2f}',f'{a:.2f}',f'{v:.2f}',f'{p:.1f}'])\nrank=sorted(rows,key=lambda r:r[3]/r[1],reverse=True)\ntop=[r for r in rank if r[3]>0][:3]; low=rank[-1]\nb=sum(r[1] for r in rows); a=sum(r[2] for r in rows); v=a-b\np=(v/b*100).quantize(D('.1'),rounding=ROUND_HALF_UP)\nmemo=f'''# Q1 2026 Budget Review\n\nTo: CFO\n\nThe largest percentage overspends were {budgets[top[0][0]][0]} ({top[0][4]:+.1f}%), {budgets[top[1][0]][0]} ({top[1][4]:+.1f}%), and {budgets[top[2][0]][0]} ({top[2][4]:+.1f}%), in descending order. {budgets[low[0]][0]} recorded the largest percentage underspend ({low[4]:+.1f}%).\n\nTotal Q1 expenses were \"'${a:,.2f} against a ${b:,.2f} budget, a ${abs(v):,.2f} {'\"'overspend' if v>0 else 'underspend'} ({p:+.1f}%). Actuals include only January 1\u2013March 31 ledger dates, exclude accounts starting with 9, consolidate legacy department codes, and deduct reversals and credits.\n\nRecommendation: Ask the three largest percentage overspend departments to explain their variances and propose corrective actions; confirm whether the largest underspend reflects timing or lasting savings.\n'''\nPath('memo.md').write_text(memo)\nassert len(memo.split())<=200\nwith open('variance.csv',newline='') as f:\n out=list(csv.DictReader(f))\nassert len(out)==len(budgets)\nfor r in out:\n code=r['dept_code']; budget=budgets[code][1]\n assert D(r['actual'])==actual[code]\n assert D(r['variance'])==actual[code]-budget\n assert D(r['variance_pct'])==((actual[code]-budget)/budget*100).quantize(D('.1'),rounding=ROUND_HALF_UP)\nprint(Path('variance.csv').read_text())\nprint(memo)\nprint('Verified:',counts,'; memo words:',len(memo.split()))\nPY\"", "aggregated_output": "/bin/bash: line 1: python: command not found\n", "exit_code": 127, "status": "failed"}}
{"type": "item.started", "item": {"id": "item_4", "type": "command_execution", "command": "/bin/bash -lc \"python3 - <<'PY'\nimport csv\nfrom decimal import Decimal as D, ROUND_HALF_UP\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\ndef read(p):\n with open(p,newline='') as f: return list(csv.DictReader(f))\nbudgets=read('budget.csv'); remap={r['legacy_code']:r['dept_code'] for r in read('dept_remap.csv')}\nactual={r['dept_code']:D(0) for r in budgets}\nfor r in read('ledger.csv'):\n if not '2026-01-01'<=r['date']<='2026-03-31' or r['account'].startswith('9'): continue\n s=r['amount'].replace(',','').strip()\n amount=-D(s[1:-1]) if s.startswith('(') else D(s)\n actual[remap.get(r['dept_code'],r['dept_code'])]+=amount\nrows=[]\nfor r in sorted(budgets,key=lambda r:r['dept_code']):\n b=D(r['q1_budget']); a=actual[r['dept_code']]; v=a-b; p=v/b*100\n rows.append(dict(code=r['dept_code'],name=r['dept_name'],b=b,a=a,v=v,p=p,rounded=p.quantize(D('.1'),rounding=ROUND_HALF_UP)))\nwith open('variance.csv','w',newline='') as f:\n w=csv.writer(f); w.writerow(['dept_code','budget','actual','variance','variance_pct'])\n for r in rows: w.writerow([r['code'],f\\\"{r['b']:.2f}\\\",f\\\"{r['a']:.2f}\\\",f\\\"{r['v']:.2f}\\\",f\\\"{r['rounded']:.1f}\\\"])\nrank=sorted(rows,key=lambda r:r['p'],reverse=True); top=[r for r in rank if r['p']>0][:3]; low=rank[-1]\nmentions=[f\\\"{r['name']} ({r['rounded']:+.1f}%)\\\" for r in top]\nb=sum(r['b'] for r in rows); a=sum(r['a'] for r in rows); v=a-b\nmemo=f\\\"\\\"\\\"# Q1 2026 Budget Review\n\nTo: CFO\n\nThe largest percentage overspends were {mentions[0]}, {mentions[1]}, and {mentions[2]}, in descending order. {low['name']} recorded the largest percentage underspend ({low['rounded']:+.1f}%).\n\nTotal Q1 expenses were \"'${a:,.2f} against a ${b:,.2f} budget, a ${abs(v):,.2f} {'\"'overspend' if v>0 else 'underspend'}. Actuals include only January 1\u2013March 31 ledger dates, exclude accounts starting with 9, consolidate legacy department codes, and deduct reversals and credits.\n\nRecommendation: Ask the three largest percentage overspend departments to explain their variances and propose corrective actions; confirm whether the largest underspend reflects timing or lasting savings.\n\\\"\\\"\\\"\nPath('memo.md').write_text(memo)\nassert len(memo.split())<=200\nout=read('variance.csv'); assert len(out)==len(budgets)\nfor saved,r in zip(out,rows):\n assert saved['dept_code']==r['code']\n assert D(saved['actual'])==r['a']\n assert D(saved['variance'])==r['a']-r['b']\n assert D(saved['variance_pct'])==(r['v']/r['b']*100).quantize(D('.1'),rounding=ROUND_HALF_UP)\nprint(Path('variance.csv').read_text()); print(memo); print('Verified; memo word count:',len(memo.split()))\nPY\"", "aggregated_output": "", "exit_code": null, "status": "in_progress"}}
{"type": "item.completed", "item": {"id": "item_4", "type": "command_execution", "command": "/bin/bash -lc \"python3 - <<'PY'\nimport csv\nfrom decimal import Decimal as D, ROUND_HALF_UP\nfrom pathlib import Path\n\ndef read(p):\n with open(p,newline='') as f: return list(csv.DictReader(f))\nbudgets=read('budget.csv'); remap={r['legacy_code']:r['dept_code'] for r in read('dept_remap.csv')}\nactual={r['dept_code']:D(0) for r in budgets}\nfor r in read('ledger.csv'):\n if not '2026-01-01'<=r['date']<='2026-03-31' or r['account'].startswith('9'): continue\n s=r['amount'].replace(',','').strip()\n amount=-D(s[1:-1]) if s.startswith('(') else D(s)\n actual[remap.get(r['dept_code'],r['dept_code'])]+=amount\nrows=[]\nfor r in sorted(budgets,key=lambda r:r['dept_code']):\n b=D(r['q1_budget']); a=actual[r['dept_code']]; v=a-b; p=v/b*100\n rows.append(dict(code=r['dept_code'],name=r['dept_name'],b=b,a=a,v=v,p=p,rounded=p.quantize(D('.1'),rounding=ROUND_HALF_UP)))\nwith open('variance.csv','w',newline='') as f:\n w=csv.writer(f); w.writerow(['dept_code','budget','actual','variance','variance_pct'])\n for r in rows: w.writerow([r['code'],f\\\"{r['b']:.2f}\\\",f\\\"{r['a']:.2f}\\\",f\\\"{r['v']:.2f}\\\",f\\\"{r['rounded']:.1f}\\\"])\nrank=sorted(rows,key=lambda r:r['p'],reverse=True); top=[r for r in rank if r['p']>0][:3]; low=rank[-1]\nmentions=[f\\\"{r['name']} ({r['rounded']:+.1f}%)\\\" for r in top]\nb=sum(r['b'] for r in rows); a=sum(r['a'] for r in rows); v=a-b\nmemo=f\\\"\\\"\\\"# Q1 2026 Budget Review\n\nTo: CFO\n\nThe largest percentage overspends were {mentions[0]}, {mentions[1]}, and {mentions[2]}, in descending order. {low['name']} recorded the largest percentage underspend ({low['rounded']:+.1f}%).\n\nTotal Q1 expenses were \"'${a:,.2f} against a ${b:,.2f} budget, a ${abs(v):,.2f} {'\"'overspend' if v>0 else 'underspend'}. Actuals include only January 1\u2013March 31 ledger dates, exclude accounts starting with 9, consolidate legacy department codes, and deduct reversals and credits.\n\nRecommendation: Ask the three largest percentage overspend departments to explain their variances and propose corrective actions; confirm whether the largest underspend reflects timing or lasting savings.\n\\\"\\\"\\\"\nPath('memo.md').write_text(memo)\nassert len(memo.split())<=200\nout=read('variance.csv'); assert len(out)==len(budgets)\nfor saved,r in zip(out,rows):\n assert saved['dept_code']==r['code']\n assert D(saved['actual'])==r['a']\n assert D(saved['variance'])==r['a']-r['b']\n assert D(saved['variance_pct'])==(r['v']/r['b']*100).quantize(D('.1'),rounding=ROUND_HALF_UP)\nprint(Path('variance.csv').read_text()); print(memo); print('Verified; memo word count:',len(memo.split()))\nPY\"", "aggregated_output": "dept_code,budget,actual,variance,variance_pct\nENG,420000.00,433020.00,13020.00,3.1\nFIN,70000.00,68530.00,-1470.00,-2.1\nHR,60000.00,65340.00,5340.00,8.9\nLEG,45000.00,47115.00,2115.00,4.7\nMKT,180000.00,209520.00,29520.00,16.4\nOPS,140000.00,121380.00,-18620.00,-13.3\nSAL,260000.00,241280.00,-18720.00,-7.2\nSUP,95000.00,106210.00,11210.00,11.8\n\n# Q1 2026 Budget Review\n\nTo: CFO\n\nThe largest percentage overspends were Marketing (+16.4%), Customer Support (+11.8%), and People Operations (+8.9%), in descending order. Operations recorded the largest percentage underspend (-13.3%).\n\nTotal Q1 expenses were $1,292,395.00 against a $1,270,000.00 budget, a $22,395.00 overspend. Actuals include only January 1\u2013March 31 ledger dates, exclude accounts starting with 9, consolidate legacy department codes, and deduct reversals and credits.\n\nRecommendation: Ask the three largest percentage overspend departments to explain their variances and propose corrective actions; confirm whether the largest underspend reflects timing or lasting savings.\n\nVerified; memo word count: 91\n", "exit_code": 0, "status": "completed"}}
{"type": "item.completed", "item": {"id": "item_5", "type": "agent_message", "text": "Created and verified [variance.csv](variance.csv) and [memo.md](memo.md).\n\nQ1 actuals total **$1,292,395.00**, a **$22,395.00 overspend**. The memo is 91 words and includes the required department rankings and percentages."}}
{"type": "turn.completed", "usage": {"input_tokens": 95866, "cached_input_tokens": 76928, "cache_write_input_tokens": 0, "output_tokens": 2027, "reasoning_output_tokens": 18}}