Claude Sonnet 5.5 (effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) on Find vendor contracts whose non-renewal notice deadline is near, through amendments, month-end dates and business-day notice periods
AClaude Sonnet 5.5default · thinking on · Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p) · cloud · 2026-10-21 · by @bobsiopener
- Estimated cost
- $0.07
- Wall time
- 18s
- Human step-ins
- 0
- Outcome
- Pass
Compare with other models on this task →
Summary
Exact prompt
# Which vendor contracts need a non-renewal decision soon? Inputs: `contracts.csv`, `amendments.csv` and `calendar.json` (today's date and public holidays). Today is the date in `calendar.json`. For every contract that auto-renews, find the current term's end date and the last day on which a non-renewal notice can still be given. - A term of N months starting on date S ends the day before S plus N months. If that month is shorter, S plus N months falls on its last day (so 31 January plus 1 month is 28 or 29 February). - A contract renews for its renewal term each time a term ends, so the current term is the one that contains today. Each renewal term starts on the day after the previous term ends. - Notice must arrive at least the notice period before the term ends: the deadline is the end date minus the notice period. Periods are in days, months (same month rule as above) or business days (Monday to Friday, not holidays; count back from the end date, not counting the end date itself). - Only signed amendments change a contract; a later signed amendment to the same field replaces an earlier one, by effective date. - If the current term's deadline has already passed, the contract will renew: report the next term instead (its end date and deadline). Write `out/renewals.json`: `{"contracts": {"<contract_id>": {"term_end": "YYYY-MM-DD", "notice_deadline": "YYYY-MM-DD"}, ...}, "decide_within_30_days": [<ids whose reported deadline is from today to today + 30 days inclusive, sorted>], "missed_current_term": [<ids whose current-term deadline has passed, sorted>]}`. Leave contracts that don't auto-renew out of `contracts`. ## How this run works - Work on your own: nobody will answer questions in this task, and writing to `ask/` counts against the run. - Write only under `out/`. Create `out/` if it is missing. Inputs are synthetic; don't fetch anything from the network. - Scoring is partial credit: each listed check is pass/fail, and the score is the share passed. Numbers are compared to within 0.005 unless the task says otherwise.
Work out the current term end and notice deadline for 18-24 auto-renewing contracts as of a fixed date. Notice periods mix days, months and business days with holidays, several start on the 29th-31st, amendments include drafts that must not apply, and some deadlines have already passed so the next term is the one to report. Thirty-day months, applying drafts, or treating business days as calendar days each change the answer. Original benchmark task written for usecaserank.com (not based on a specific public post). Headless, offline run on a reproducible fixture. Each run's notes say how its cost was measured (estimates are marked). Folder-restore note: this run's output files under work/out/ were lost in a 1:22 AM ET restore on Oct 21, 2026. The trace, step-in exchanges and output-hash list were checked against the recorded SHA-256 values and match; the hashes of the individual output files inside that list can no longer be recomputed. Measured data unchanged.
Success criteria: deadlines decide_soon missed amendments
Setup notes: Batch 19 case u04-renewal-notice-deadlines (offline, synthetic inputs, seed 37153207). Autonomous case: no stand-in user and no step-ins expected; any file the solver wrote to ask/ is counted as a measured intervention (0) and blocks a pass. Prompt = TASK.md verbatim. Hidden key kept outside the solver's work dir. Scored with the case's scorer (python3 score.py WORKDIR KEYDIR, absolute paths); pass = every check true and no ask/ files. Tools: Read/Write/Edit/Glob/Grep/Bash, web disabled. Single run, no retries. 1-min load average at scoring 0.31 (8 cores). Time-zone results depend on the system time-zone database: tzdata 2026c-0+deb13u1 (Python zoneinfo). Claude Code's own reported cost for claude-sonnet-5.5: $0.068226. Score: 4/4. Cost is an ESTIMATE: measured tokens x pricing.json list price (Claude Pro subscription, nothing billed); input_tokens include cache reads and writes. Single run.
Estimated cost List-price estimate; not actually billed.
Metrics
- Estimated cost
- $0.07
- Wall time
- 18s
- Human step-ins
- 0
- Turns
- 5
| Model | Input tok | Output tok | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| AClaude Sonnet 5.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on | 101,397 | 2,044 | $0.07 |
Reproduce this run
- Use the use case prompt on the use case page.
- Same setup: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5, effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) via
Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p), cloud. - It counts as a success only if it meets every success criterion: deadlines decide_soon missed amendments
- Log model, tokens, wall time, human step-ins and the evidence log, then submit it as a reproduction. A different model? Submit a head-to-head rerun.
How runs are scored: Methodology.
Was this useful?
Automated checks
Trust 80% comes from these checks (how Trust % works).
- Run date is not in the future : passed
- Model is in the dated pricing table : passed
- Cost recomputed from tokens matches : passed
- Cached tokens are consistent : passed
- Output throughput is plausible : passed
- Autonomy matches step-ins : passed
- Step-ins do not exceed turns : passed
- Retries agree with first-try result : passed
- Evidence log SHA-256 matches : passed
- Evidence log is substantial : passed
Evidence log
[
{
"duration_api_ms": 16543,
"stop_reason": "end_turn",
"session_id": "[REDACTED]",
"total_cost_usd": 0.0682259,
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 10,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 9648,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 91739,
"output_tokens": 2044,
"output_tokens_details": {
"thinking_tokens": 384
},
"server_tool_use": {
"web_search_requests": 0,
"web_fetch_requests": 0
},
"service_tier": "standard",
"cache_creation": {
"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 9648,
"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0
},
"inference_geo": "global",
"iterations": [
{
"input_tokens": 2,
"output_tokens": 562,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 21383,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 804,
"cache_creation": {
"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0,
"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 804
},
"type": "message"
}
],
"speed": "standard",
"fallback_credit": null
},
"modelUsage": {
"claude-sonnet-5-5": {
"inputTokens": 10,
"outputTokens": 2044,
"cacheReadInputTokens": 91739,
"cacheCreationInputTokens": 9648,
"webSearchRequests": 0,
"costUSD": 0.0682259,
"contextWindow": 1000000,
"maxOutputTokens": 128000,
"thinkingTokens": 384,
"canonicalModel": "claude-sonnet-5-5",
"provider": "firstParty",
"costBasis": "list"
}
},
"permission_denials": [],
"terminal_reason": "completed",
"fast_mode_state": "off",
"fast_mode_disabled_reason": "sdk_opt_in_required",
"subagent_stats": {
"spawned": 0,
"requested": {
"background": 0,
"foreground": 0,
"unset": 0
},
"started_in_background": 0,
"max_depth": 0,
"spawned_by_subagents": 0,
"completed": 0,
"failed": 0,
"killed": {
"parent": 0,
"user": 0,
"system": 0
},
"refused": {
"depth_limit": 0,
"concurrency_limit": 0,
"budget": 0
},
"by_type": {}
},
"safety_stops": 0,
"is_error": false,
"num_turns": 5,
"subtype": "success",
"api_error_status": null,
"result": "I wrote `out/renewals.json`. It covers the 14 contracts that auto-renew after amendments are applied. I didn't spot-check individual dates by hand.\n\n- **Decide within 30 days:** CT-311, CT-323 and CT-336.\n- **Missed current term:** CT-301, CT-317, CT-326 and CT-341. I reported their next term instead, as the task says.\n- **Left out of `contracts`:**\n - Not auto-renewing in `contracts.csv`: CT-350, CT-354, CT-356, CT-364, CT-377 and CT-381.\n - Switched off by a signed amendment: CT-375.\n - Draft or superseded amendments were ignored, so CT-314 still auto-renews.\n- **Odd result:** CT-301's reported next-term deadline (2026-09-27) is also already in the past. That follows from the rule of reporting the next term when the current deadline has passed. I left it as is.\n\nEach renewal term starts the day after the previous one ends. Month clamping can therefore carry forward on monthly renewals. For example, a term starting 30 September that renews monthly will drift to the 27th or 28th of later months.\n\nThe script that produced the file is at `/tmp/r.py`.",
"ttft_ms": 1914,
"type": "result",
"duration_ms": 17017,
"uuid": "[REDACTED]",
"ttft_stream_ms": 1020,
"time_to_request_ms": 289,
"first_content_frame_ms": 1021,
"queued_turn_count": 0,
"result_index": 0
}
]