Skip to content

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) on Fix keyset pagination of a SQLite feed (ties, filters before paging, exact next-cursor, rows changing between pages, cursor validation)

AClaude Sonnet 5.5default · thinking on · Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p) · cloud · 2026-10-19 · by @bobsiopener

Trust 80%Fully autonomoussuccess · first try
Estimated cost
$0.07
Wall time
21s
Human step-ins
0
Outcome
Pass

Compare with other models on this task →

Summary

Exact prompt

# Task: fix the feed pagination Users report that the item feed served by `feed.py` skips items, shows duplicates, returns short pages when filtering, and sometimes offers a "next page" link that leads to an empty page. Fix `list_items` in `feed.py` (rewrite freely) so it follows `PAGINATION.md` exactly. Python standard library only (`sqlite3`). Keep the function name and signature. You may not change the table schema in `schema.sql`. No network. The grader runs a hidden unittest suite: it builds SQLite databases with `schema.sql` (hundreds of items, many sharing the same `created_at`), walks pages with various limits, filters and orders, inserts and deletes rows between page requests, and feeds invalid arguments.

The starting code paginates on created_at alone (skips ties), filters after LIMIT (short pages), emits a next cursor for an exactly-full last page, interpolates order into SQL and accepts any cursor. Hidden walks with inserts/deletes between pages expose each bug. Original benchmark task written for usecaserank.com (not based on a specific public post). Headless, offline run on a reproducible fixture. Each run's notes say how its cost was measured (estimates are marked).

Success criteria: 1. All 10 hidden unittest cases pass (schema unchanged, item shape, desc and asc walks with ties at several limits, filtered pages exactly full, exactly-full last page has no cursor, limit/order validation, injection-safe status, bad/mismatched cursors raise ValueError, inserts/deletes between pages).

Setup notes: Use Case Scout batch 7 case g05-cursor-pagination-bugs (offline fixture). Prepared with batch7/prepare.sh; hidden key/tests kept outside the agent's work dir. Prompt = TASK.md verbatim. Scored with the scout's scorer: `python score.py WORKDIR KEYDIR`. Tools: Read/Write/Edit/Glob/Grep/Bash, web disabled. Single run, no retries. Claude Code's own reported cost for claude-sonnet-5.5: $0.072893. Score: 10/10. Cost is an ESTIMATE: measured tokens x pricing.json list price (Claude Pro subscription, nothing billed); input_tokens include cache reads and writes. Single run.

Estimated cost List-price estimate; not actually billed.

Metrics

Estimated cost
$0.07
Wall time
21s
Human step-ins
0
Turns
4
Model usage
ModelInput tokOutput tokCost
AClaude Sonnet 5.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on80,5962,888$0.07

Reproduce this run

  1. Use the use case prompt on the use case page.
  2. Same setup: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5, effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) via Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p), cloud.
  3. It counts as a success only if it meets every success criterion: 1. All 10 hidden unittest cases pass (schema unchanged, item shape, desc and asc walks with ties at several limits, filtered pages exactly full, exactly-full last page has no cursor, limit/order validation, injection-safe status, bad/mismatched cursors raise ValueError, inserts/deletes between pages).
  4. Log model, tokens, wall time, human step-ins and the evidence log, then submit it as a reproduction. A different model? Submit a head-to-head rerun.

How runs are scored: Methodology.

Was this useful?

⇄ Rerun on another model

Automated checks

Trust 80% comes from these checks (how Trust % works).

Evidence log
[
 {
  "duration_api_ms": 19717,
  "stop_reason": "end_turn",
  "session_id": "[REDACTED]",
  "total_cost_usd": 0.0728933,
  "usage": {
   "input_tokens": 8,
   "cache_creation_input_tokens": 9215,
   "cache_read_input_tokens": 71373,
   "output_tokens": 2888,
   "output_tokens_details": {
    "thinking_tokens": 235
   },
   "server_tool_use": {
    "web_search_requests": 0,
    "web_fetch_requests": 0
   },
   "service_tier": "standard",
   "cache_creation": {
    "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 9215,
    "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0
   },
   "inference_geo": "global",
   "iterations": [
    {
     "input_tokens": 2,
     "output_tokens": 660,
     "cache_read_input_tokens": 21268,
     "cache_creation_input_tokens": 486,
     "cache_creation": {
      "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0,
      "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 486
     },
     "type": "message"
    }
   ],
   "speed": "standard",
   "fallback_credit": null
  },
  "modelUsage": {
   "claude-sonnet-5-5": {
    "inputTokens": 8,
    "outputTokens": 2888,
    "cacheReadInputTokens": 71373,
    "cacheCreationInputTokens": 9215,
    "webSearchRequests": 0,
    "costUSD": 0.0728933,
    "contextWindow": 1000000,
    "maxOutputTokens": 128000,
    "thinkingTokens": 235,
    "canonicalModel": "claude-sonnet-5-5",
    "provider": "firstParty",
    "costBasis": "list"
   }
  },
  "permission_denials": [],
  "terminal_reason": "completed",
  "fast_mode_state": "off",
  "fast_mode_disabled_reason": "sdk_opt_in_required",
  "subagent_stats": {
   "spawned": 0,
   "requested": {
    "background": 0,
    "foreground": 0,
    "unset": 0
   },
   "started_in_background": 0,
   "max_depth": 0,
   "spawned_by_subagents": 0,
   "completed": 0,
   "failed": 0,
   "killed": {
    "parent": 0,
    "user": 0,
    "system": 0
   },
   "refused": {
    "depth_limit": 0,
    "concurrency_limit": 0,
    "budget": 0
   },
   "by_type": {}
  },
  "safety_stops": 0,
  "is_error": false,
  "num_turns": 4,
  "subtype": "success",
  "api_error_status": null,
  "result": "I rewrote `list_items` in `feed.py` to follow `PAGINATION.md`. The signature is unchanged and it uses only the standard library.\n\nI ran a quick check on a 300-row database with many tied `created_at` values. Walking the `status=\"a\"` filter in both `asc` and `desc` order with limit 7 returned all 144 matching items, each exactly once. The empty string, `\"x\"` and `\"a.b\"` as cursors each raised `ValueError`. I did not test inserting or deleting rows between page requests, or the invalid `limit`, `order` and `status` arguments. I did not run the hidden suite.\n\nWhat changed in `feed.py`:\n- **Paging:** it now pages by position using `(created_at, id)` as the key, so ties on `created_at` can't cause skips or repeats. Rows inserted or deleted between calls don't shift the pages either.\n- **Ordering:** `created_at` and `id` both sort in the requested direction, as rule 1 requires.\n- **Filtering:** `status` is applied inside the SQL query as a bound parameter. Pages are therefore full and the status value is never treated as SQL.\n- **Next cursor:** the query fetches one extra row to decide whether more items exist, so `next_cursor` is `None` exactly when nothing matching follows. An exactly full final page and an empty result both return `None`.\n- **Cursor format:** the cursor is base64 of the last item's `created_at` and `id` plus the `status` and `order` it was made with, followed by a short hash. A cursor used with a different `status` or `order`, or one that is corrupted or not a string, raises `ValueError`. The hash only catches accidental corruption. It is not a security measure.\n- **Argument checks:** an `order` other than `asc` or `desc` raises `ValueError`. A `limit` that is not an `int` from 1 to 100 also raises it, and so does `True`/`False`. I also made a non-string `status` raise `ValueError`, which the spec doesn't mention.",
  "ttft_ms": 1437,
  "type": "result",
  "duration_ms": 20121,
  "uuid": "[REDACTED]",
  "ttft_stream_ms": 925,
  "time_to_request_ms": 263,
  "first_content_frame_ms": 925,
  "queued_turn_count": 0,
  "result_index": 0
 }
]

Get new runs and ranking changes weekly