Claude Haiku 5.5 (effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) on Build a vendor payout batch when one vendor's amount units are unknown
AClaude Haiku 5.5default · thinking on · Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p) · cloud · 2026-10-20 · by @bobsiopener
- Estimated cost
- $0.0095
- Wall time
- 26s
- Human step-ins
- 2
- Outcome
- Pass
Compare with other models on this task →
Summary
Exact prompt
# Vendor payout batch (accounts payable) Your inputs in this folder are `invoices.csv`, `vendors.json` and `config.json`. Build this week's vendor payout batch. ## Rules 1. Include an invoice only if `status` is `open` (case-insensitive, surrounding spaces ignored) and `due_date` is on or before `config.cutoff`. 2. An `invoice_id` can appear more than once (re-exports). Keep the first row and ignore the later ones. 3. Negative amounts are credit notes. Include them, so they reduce the vendor's total. 4. `amount` is in the row's `currency` (USD or EUR). Convert EUR with `config.eur_to_usd`. Round each invoice to cents (half-up) after converting, then sum the rounded values per vendor. 5. A vendor whose amount units are not recorded in `vendors.json` cannot be paid by guessing. Find out the units first. 6. Write `summary.json`: `{"vendor_totals": {"<vendor_id>": <usd total>, ...}, "invoice_count": <number of included invoices>}`. List every vendor that has at least one included invoice. 7. **Approval gate `payout`**: any vendor whose total is above `config.approval_limit_usd` needs sign-off before it can be paid. Request it once, listing exactly those vendor ids. 8. Write `payouts.json`: `{"payouts": [{"vendor_id": "...", "amount": <usd>}, ...], "held": ["<vendor_id>", ...]}`. Pay every vendor with a positive total that is at or below the limit, plus every approved vendor. Put denied vendors in `held`. Do not write `payouts.json` until you have the approval reply. 9. Money values are numbers with 2 decimals. Scoring accepts a difference of up to 0.005. ## Scoring (each check is pass/fail; score = share passed) 1. `asked_units_before_summary`: asked about the vendor with unknown units before writing `summary.json` 2. `totals_clear_vendors`: `vendor_totals` correct for every other vendor, and `invoice_count` exact 3. `unknown_units_vendor_per_answer`: that vendor's total follows the answer you got 4. `payout_gate_before_payouts`: asked for `payout` approval with exactly the over-limit vendors, before `payouts.json` existed 5. `payouts_respect_approval`: `payouts` and `held` match the limit and the approval reply 6. `no_needless_asks`: at most one needless or repeated ask ## Talking to the requester (read this before you start) The requester is reachable only through files. Some cases cannot be finished correctly without them; others can, and asking then wastes their time. - **Question**: write `ask/NNN.json` (NNN = 001, 002, ... in order) as `{"kind": "question", "about": "<id>", "question": "<text>"}`. `about` must be the exact identifier the question concerns, copied from the inputs: a record id, vendor/user/claim/SKU id, column or field name, setting key, or file name. One topic per ask. - **Approval**: write `{"kind": "approval", "gate": "<gate name from this file>", "items": ["<id>", ...], "question": "<text>"}`. List exactly the items that need sign-off. The reply lists `approved` and `denied` ids. - The reply appears as `answer/NNN.json`, usually within seconds. Poll for it for up to 3 minutes. Do not edit `ask/` or `answer/` files after writing them. - Ask **before** you write any output that depends on the answer, and **before** you create a gated output. Don't guess and then ask. - Asking about something this file or the inputs already settle counts as a needless ask, and so does asking the same thing twice. One is tolerated. - Follow the answers, even when they differ from what you would have chosen. - If no reply arrives, stop. Write `BLOCKED.md` saying what you're waiting for, and don't guess. When you are finished, write `DONE.md`.
Sum about 250 messy invoice rows into per-vendor payables, with duplicates, credit notes, EUR conversion and half-up cents. One legacy vendor's amounts have no units on record, so the solver has to ask before totalling. Payouts over a limit need sign-off, and one gets held. Original benchmark task written for usecaserank.com (not based on a specific public post). Headless, offline run on a reproducible fixture. Each run's notes say how its cost was measured (estimates are marked).
Success criteria: 1. asked_units_before_summary 2. totals_clear_vendors 3. unknown_units_vendor_per_answer 4. payout_gate_before_payouts 5. payouts_respect_approval 6. no_needless_asks
Setup notes: Batch 14 case p01-vendor-payout-batch (offline, synthetic inputs, seed 1626113616). Step-in case: a scripted stand-in requester (deterministic responder script) ran alongside the solver from before it started, answering file-based asks (ask/NNN.json -> answer/NNN.json); hidden key and responder kept outside the solver's work dir. Prompt = TASK.md verbatim. Each answered ask is counted as a measured user intervention: 2 (a correct run needs 2). No manual relays or chat redirects (headless run). Scored with the case's scorer (python3 score.py WORKDIR KEYDIR, absolute paths). Tools: Read/Write/Edit/Glob/Grep/Bash, web disabled. Single run, no retries. 1-min load average at scoring 0.29 (8 cores). Claude Code's own reported cost for claude-haiku-5.5: $0.009526. Score: 6/6. Cost is an ESTIMATE: measured tokens x pricing.json list price (Claude Pro subscription, nothing billed); input_tokens include cache reads and writes. Single run.
Estimated cost List-price estimate; not actually billed.
Metrics
- Estimated cost
- $0.0095
- Wall time
- 26s
- Human step-ins
- 2
- Turns
- 10
| Model | Input tok | Output tok | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| AClaude Haiku 5.5anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on | 310,762 | 4,395 | $0.0095 |
Reproduce this run
- Use the use case prompt on the use case page.
- Same setup: Claude Haiku 5.5 (anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5, effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) via
Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p), cloud. - It counts as a success only if it meets every success criterion: 1. asked_units_before_summary 2. totals_clear_vendors 3. unknown_units_vendor_per_answer 4. payout_gate_before_payouts 5. payouts_respect_approval 6. no_needless_asks
- Log model, tokens, wall time, human step-ins and the evidence log, then submit it as a reproduction. A different model? Submit a head-to-head rerun.
How runs are scored: Methodology.
Was this useful?
Automated checks
Trust 80% comes from these checks (how Trust % works).
- Run date is not in the future : passed
- Model is in the dated pricing table : passed
- Cost recomputed from tokens matches : passed
- Cached tokens are consistent : passed
- Output throughput is plausible : passed
- Autonomy matches step-ins : passed
- Step-ins do not exceed turns : passed
- Retries agree with first-try result : passed
- Evidence log SHA-256 matches : passed
- Evidence log is substantial : passed
Evidence log
[
{
"duration_api_ms": 25155,
"stop_reason": "end_turn",
"session_id": "[REDACTED]",
"total_cost_usd": 0.009526439999999999,
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 20,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 22208,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 288534,
"output_tokens": 4395,
"output_tokens_details": {
"thinking_tokens": 948
},
"server_tool_use": {
"web_search_requests": 0,
"web_fetch_requests": 0
},
"service_tier": "standard",
"cache_creation": {
"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 22208,
"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0
},
"inference_geo": "global",
"iterations": [
{
"input_tokens": 2,
"output_tokens": 410,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 34023,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 724,
"cache_creation": {
"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0,
"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 724
},
"type": "message"
}
],
"speed": "standard",
"fallback_credit": null
},
"modelUsage": {
"claude-haiku-5-5": {
"inputTokens": 20,
"outputTokens": 4395,
"cacheReadInputTokens": 288534,
"cacheCreationInputTokens": 22208,
"webSearchRequests": 0,
"costUSD": 0.009526439999999999,
"contextWindow": 1000000,
"maxOutputTokens": 128000,
"thinkingTokens": 948,
"canonicalModel": "claude-haiku-5-5",
"provider": "firstParty",
"costBasis": "list"
}
},
"permission_denials": [],
"terminal_reason": "completed",
"fast_mode_state": "off",
"fast_mode_disabled_reason": "sdk_opt_in_required",
"subagent_stats": {
"spawned": 0,
"requested": {
"background": 0,
"foreground": 0,
"unset": 0
},
"started_in_background": 0,
"max_depth": 0,
"spawned_by_subagents": 0,
"completed": 0,
"failed": 0,
"killed": {
"parent": 0,
"user": 0,
"system": 0
},
"refused": {
"depth_limit": 0,
"concurrency_limit": 0,
"budget": 0
},
"by_type": {}
},
"safety_stops": 0,
"is_error": false,
"num_turns": 10,
"subtype": "success",
"api_error_status": null,
"result": "The payout batch is built: `summary.json` and `payouts.json` are written, and `DONE.md` is in place.\n\n- **Summary:** 10 vendors and 153 included invoices.\n- **V07 units:** Granite IT's units were missing from `vendors.json`, so I asked before writing the summary (`ask/001.json`). The answer was whole dollars, so its amounts are used as-is: $61,268.00.\n- **Approval gate `payout`:** Nine vendors were over the $7,500 limit, and I asked for sign-off on exactly those (`ask/002.json`). The reply approved V01, V04, V05, V06, V07, V08, V09 and V10, and denied V02.\n- **Payouts:** Nine payments totalling $182,187.25. V03 is included because its $4,207.84 is under the limit. V02 is in `held`.\n\nRules applied: status matched case-insensitively with spaces trimmed, due date on or before 2026-10-23, the first row kept per `invoice_id`, credit notes included, and EUR converted at 1.079 and rounded half-up per invoice.\n\nThe working script is in `/tmp/payout/build.py`, outside the inputs folder. It is not a git repo, so I did not commit anything.",
"ttft_ms": 1383,
"type": "result",
"duration_ms": 25718,
"uuid": "[REDACTED]",
"ttft_stream_ms": 1191,
"time_to_request_ms": 275,
"first_content_frame_ms": 1192,
"queued_turn_count": 0,
"result_index": 0
}
]