Claude Sonnet 5.5 (effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) on Implement npm-style semver range matching (caret/tilde/x/hyphen, prerelease rule) from a written spec
AClaude Sonnet 5.5default · thinking on · Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p) · cloud · 2026-10-17 · by @bobsiopener
- Estimated cost
- $0.14
- Wall time
- 52s
- Human step-ins
- 0
- Outcome
- Pass
Compare with other models on this task →
Summary
Exact prompt
# Task: implement semver range matching Implement `compare`, `satisfies` and `max_satisfying` in `semrange.py` following `RANGES.md` exactly (it is a subset of npm's node-semver semantics; prerelease handling is graded). Python standard library only; no third-party packages, no network. Add tests if you want.
Desugaring partial versions with implicit -0 upper bounds, caret on 0.x/0.0.x, hyphen ranges with partial ends, and the same-tuple prerelease rule are classic places where implementations diverge from npm. Original benchmark task written for usecaserank.com (not based on a specific public post). Headless, offline run on a reproducible fixture. Each run's notes say how its cost was measured (estimates are marked).
Success criteria: 1. All 49 hidden unittest cases pass (60 s cap): 46 satisfies() vectors, compare() precedence incl. prerelease ordering and build metadata, ValueError on invalid versions/ranges, max_satisfying() incl. skipping invalid strings and returning the original string.
Setup notes: Use Case Scout batch 5 case e11-semver-ranges (offline fixture). Prepared with batch5/prepare.sh; hidden key/tests kept outside the agent's work dir. Prompt = TASK.md verbatim. Scored with the scout's scorer: `python score.py WORKDIR KEYDIR`. Tools: Read/Write/Edit/Glob/Grep/Bash, web disabled. Single run, no retries. Rescored 2026-10-16 with Scout's fixed scorer (see batch5/CHANGES-2026-10-17.md). The original score was 48/49, and the model's output is unchanged. Claude Code's own reported cost for claude-sonnet-5.5: $0.143781. Score: 49/49. Cost is an ESTIMATE: measured tokens x pricing.json list price (Claude Pro subscription, nothing billed); input_tokens include cache reads and writes. Single run.
Estimated cost List-price estimate; not actually billed.
Metrics
- Estimated cost
- $0.14
- Wall time
- 52s
- Human step-ins
- 0
- Turns
- 5
| Model | Input tok | Output tok | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| AClaude Sonnet 5.5anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on | 116,793 | 7,641 | $0.14 |
Reproduce this run
- Use the use case prompt on the use case page.
- Same setup: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5, effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) via
Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p), cloud. - It counts as a success only if it meets every success criterion: 1. All 49 hidden unittest cases pass (60 s cap): 46 satisfies() vectors, compare() precedence incl. prerelease ordering and build metadata, ValueError on invalid versions/ranges, max_satisfying() incl. skipping invalid strings and returning the original string.
- Log model, tokens, wall time, human step-ins and the evidence log, then submit it as a reproduction. A different model? Submit a head-to-head rerun.
How runs are scored: Methodology.
Was this useful?
Automated checks
Trust 80% comes from these checks (how Trust % works).
- Run date is not in the future : passed
- Model is in the dated pricing table : passed
- Cost recomputed from tokens matches : passed
- Cached tokens are consistent : passed
- Output throughput is plausible : passed
- Autonomy matches step-ins : passed
- Step-ins do not exceed turns : passed
- Retries agree with first-try result : passed
- Evidence log SHA-256 matches : passed
- Evidence log is substantial : passed
Evidence log
[
{
"duration_api_ms": 50668,
"stop_reason": "end_turn",
"session_id": "[REDACTED]",
"total_cost_usd": 0.14378080000000001,
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 10,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 14275,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 102508,
"output_tokens": 7641,
"output_tokens_details": {
"thinking_tokens": 2122
},
"server_tool_use": {
"web_search_requests": 0,
"web_fetch_requests": 0
},
"service_tier": "standard",
"cache_creation": {
"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 14275,
"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0
},
"inference_geo": "global",
"iterations": [
{
"input_tokens": 2,
"output_tokens": 354,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 26477,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 337,
"cache_creation": {
"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0,
"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 337
},
"type": "message"
}
],
"speed": "standard",
"fallback_credit": null
},
"modelUsage": {
"claude-sonnet-5-5": {
"inputTokens": 10,
"outputTokens": 7641,
"cacheReadInputTokens": 102508,
"cacheCreationInputTokens": 14275,
"webSearchRequests": 0,
"costUSD": 0.14378080000000001,
"contextWindow": 1000000,
"maxOutputTokens": 128000,
"thinkingTokens": 2122,
"canonicalModel": "claude-sonnet-5-5",
"provider": "firstParty",
"costBasis": "list"
}
},
"permission_denials": [],
"terminal_reason": "completed",
"fast_mode_state": "off",
"fast_mode_disabled_reason": "sdk_opt_in_required",
"subagent_stats": {
"spawned": 0,
"requested": {
"background": 0,
"foreground": 0,
"unset": 0
},
"started_in_background": 0,
"max_depth": 0,
"spawned_by_subagents": 0,
"completed": 0,
"failed": 0,
"killed": {
"parent": 0,
"user": 0,
"system": 0
},
"refused": {
"depth_limit": 0,
"concurrency_limit": 0,
"budget": 0
},
"by_type": {}
},
"safety_stops": 0,
"is_error": false,
"num_turns": 5,
"subtype": "success",
"api_error_status": null,
"result": "I implemented `compare`, `satisfies` and `max_satisfying` in `semrange.py` following `RANGES.md`. I also added `test_semrange.py`, which covers the examples in the spec plus some edge cases. Pytest isn't installed here, so I ran the tests through a small stand-in for it. The one failure was a wrong expectation in my own test (`>1` does match `2.0.0`), which I fixed, and then everything passed.\n\nThe spec was silent on a few cases, so I chose:\n- **Invalid versions:** `satisfies` and `max_satisfying` raise `ValueError` for an invalid version string, as the spec says for versions generally. npm would skip them instead.\n- **Leading zeros:** versions like `01.2.3` are rejected.\n- **Partial versions with a prerelease:** `1.2-beta` raises `ValueError`.\n- **`>*` and `<*`:** these match nothing.\n- **Equal versions in `max_satisfying`:** if two versions compare equal, such as ones that differ only in build metadata, it returns the first.",
"ttft_ms": 1722,
"type": "result",
"duration_ms": 51078,
"uuid": "[REDACTED]",
"ttft_stream_ms": 1241,
"time_to_request_ms": 201,
"first_content_frame_ms": 1241,
"queued_turn_count": 0,
"result_index": 0
}
]