Claude Haiku 5.5 (effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) on Fix a cron next-fire-time calculator (steps, names, macros, day-of-month OR day-of-week, leap days, strict validation)

AClaude Haiku 5.5default · thinking on · Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p) · cloud · 2026-10-19 · by @bobsiopener

Trust 80%Fully autonomoussuccess · first tryCompare

Estimated cost: $0.01
Wall time: 1m
Human step-ins: 0
Outcome: Pass

Compare with other models on this task →

Exact prompt

# Task: fix the cron schedule calculator `cron.py` has a function `next_fire(expr, after)` that should return the next time a cron schedule fires, but it gets many schedules wrong and is too slow for rare schedules. Fix it (rewrite freely) so it follows every rule below exactly. Python standard library only. Keep the function name and signature. No network. ## Rules 1. `expr` has exactly 5 whitespace-separated fields: minute (0-59), hour (0-23), day-of-month (1-31), month (1-12), day-of-week (0-7, where both 0 and 7 mean Sunday, 1 = Monday ... 6 = Saturday). Leading/trailing whitespace and multiple spaces between fields are allowed. 2. Each field is a comma-separated list of items. An item is `*`, a number `n`, a range `a-b` (inclusive, requires a <= b), or any of those followed by `/step` (step >= 1): `*/s` = every s-th value starting at the field minimum, `a-b/s` = a, a+s, ... up to b, and `a/s` = a, a+s, ... up to the field maximum. 3. Month names `JAN`-`DEC` and day names `SUN`-`SAT` may be used anywhere a number may be used in the month and day-of-week fields (including in ranges, e.g. `MON-FRI`), case-insensitive. 4. Macros (case-insensitive) replace the whole expression: `@yearly` and `@annually` = `0 0 1 1 *`, `@monthly` = `0 0 1 * *`, `@weekly` = `0 0 * * 0`, `@daily` and `@midnight` = `0 0 * * *`, `@hourly` = `0 * * * *`. 5. Day matching: if BOTH day-of-month and day-of-week are restricted (the field text is not exactly `*`), a day matches when EITHER field matches. If only one of them is restricted, only that one counts. A field like `*/1` or `1-31` counts as restricted. 6. `after` is a naive `datetime`. Return the earliest matching minute STRICTLY after `after`, as a naive `datetime` with seconds and microseconds 0. (If `after` is 10:00:30 and the schedule fires every minute, the answer is 10:01:00.) No time zones, no DST: treat times as plain calendar times. 7. Raise `ValueError` for: wrong number of fields, unknown macro, any value outside the field's range, `a > b` in a range, step 0 or a non-numeric step, empty items (e.g. `1,,2`), unknown names, or any other unparsable text. 8. If the schedule can never fire within 5 years after `after` (e.g. `0 0 31 2 *`), raise `ValueError` instead of looping forever. A schedule that fires only on 29 February must still be found (it is at most ~4 years away). 9. Every call must return (or raise) within 1 second on an ordinary machine, including the leap-day case. The grader runs a hidden unittest suite that checks exactly these rules.

The starting code ANDs day fields, ignores names/macros/7=Sunday, is inclusive of 'after', accepts invalid fields and scans minute by minute (too slow / never terminates for rare schedules). Each rule has exact expected datetimes. Original benchmark task written for usecaserank.com (not based on a specific public post). Headless, offline run on a reproducible fixture. Each run's notes say how its cost was measured (estimates are marked).

Success criteria: 1. All 8 hidden unittest cases pass (strictly-after semantics, lists/ranges/steps incl. a/s, month/day names, 0 and 7 = Sunday, macros, DOM/DOW OR rule incl. */1 as restricted, 18 invalid expressions raise ValueError, never-firing schedule raises within 1 s, 29 Feb found within 1 s).

Setup notes: Use Case Scout batch 7 case g01-cron-next-fire (offline fixture). Prepared with batch7/prepare.sh; hidden key/tests kept outside the agent's work dir. Prompt = TASK.md verbatim. Scored with the scout's scorer: `python score.py WORKDIR KEYDIR`. Tools: Read/Write/Edit/Glob/Grep/Bash, web disabled. Single run, no retries. Claude Code's own reported cost for claude-haiku-5.5: $0.012492. Score: 8/8. Cost is an ESTIMATE: measured tokens x pricing.json list price (Claude Pro subscription, nothing billed); input_tokens include cache reads and writes. Single run.

Estimated cost List-price estimate; not actually billed.

Metrics

Estimated cost: $0.01
Wall time: 1m
Human step-ins: 0
Turns: 5

Model usage
Model	Input tok	Output tok	Cost
AClaude Haiku 5.5anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on	138,434	14,021	$0.01

Reproduce this run

Use the use case prompt on the use case page.
Same setup: Claude Haiku 5.5 (anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5, effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) via Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p), cloud.
It counts as a success only if it meets every success criterion: 1. All 8 hidden unittest cases pass (strictly-after semantics, lists/ranges/steps incl. a/s, month/day names, 0 and 7 = Sunday, macros, DOM/DOW OR rule incl. */1 as restricted, 18 invalid expressions raise ValueError, never-firing schedule raises within 1 s, 29 Feb found within 1 s).
Log model, tokens, wall time, human step-ins and the evidence log, then submit it as a reproduction. A different model? Submit a head-to-head rerun.

How runs are scored: Methodology.

Was this useful?

⇄ Rerun on another model

Automated checks

Trust 80% comes from these checks (how Trust % works).

Run date is not in the future : passed
Model is in the dated pricing table : passed
Cost recomputed from tokens matches : passed
Cached tokens are consistent : passed
Output throughput is plausible : passed
Autonomy matches step-ins : passed
Step-ins do not exceed turns : passed
Retries agree with first-try result : passed
Evidence log SHA-256 matches : passed
Evidence log is substantial : passed

Evidence log

[
 {
  "duration_api_ms": 64961,
  "stop_reason": "end_turn",
  "session_id": "[REDACTED]",
  "total_cost_usd": 0.012492330000000001,
  "usage": {
   "input_tokens": 10,
   "cache_creation_input_tokens": 21561,
   "cache_read_input_tokens": 116863,
   "output_tokens": 14021,
   "output_tokens_details": {
    "thinking_tokens": 9176
   },
   "server_tool_use": {
    "web_search_requests": 0,
    "web_fetch_requests": 0
   },
   "service_tier": "standard",
   "cache_creation": {
    "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 21561,
    "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0
   },
   "inference_geo": "global",
   "iterations": [
    {
     "input_tokens": 2,
     "output_tokens": 734,
     "cache_read_input_tokens": 33311,
     "cache_creation_input_tokens": 789,
     "cache_creation": {
      "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0,
      "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 789
     },
     "type": "message"
    }
   ],
   "speed": "standard",
   "fallback_credit": null
  },
  "modelUsage": {
   "claude-haiku-5-5": {
    "inputTokens": 10,
    "outputTokens": 14021,
    "cacheReadInputTokens": 116863,
    "cacheCreationInputTokens": 21561,
    "webSearchRequests": 0,
    "costUSD": 0.012492330000000001,
    "contextWindow": 1000000,
    "maxOutputTokens": 128000,
    "thinkingTokens": 9176,
    "canonicalModel": "claude-haiku-5-5",
    "provider": "firstParty",
    "costBasis": "list"
   }
  },
  "permission_denials": [],
  "terminal_reason": "completed",
  "fast_mode_state": "off",
  "fast_mode_disabled_reason": "sdk_opt_in_required",
  "subagent_stats": {
   "spawned": 0,
   "requested": {
    "background": 0,
    "foreground": 0,
    "unset": 0
   },
   "started_in_background": 0,
   "max_depth": 0,
   "spawned_by_subagents": 0,
   "completed": 0,
   "failed": 0,
   "killed": {
    "parent": 0,
    "user": 0,
    "system": 0
   },
   "refused": {
    "depth_limit": 0,
    "concurrency_limit": 0,
    "budget": 0
   },
   "by_type": {}
  },
  "safety_stops": 0,
  "is_error": false,
  "num_turns": 5,
  "subtype": "success",
  "api_error_status": null,
  "result": "I rewrote `next_fire` in `cron.py`. The name and signature are unchanged, and it uses only the standard library. My ad-hoc tests pass (9 test methods covering the rules, plus a timing check).\n\nWhat changed:\n- **Parsing:** every field is validated against the rules. Empty items, bad steps, out-of-range values, reversed ranges, unknown names and wrong field counts all raise `ValueError`. Month and day names work anywhere a number does, case-insensitively. Day-of-week 7 is normalised to Sunday (0).\n- **Day matching:** if both day-of-month and day-of-week are restricted (raw text not exactly `*`), a day matches if either does. Otherwise only the restricted one counts.\n- **Macros:** all seven are supported, case-insensitively.\n- **Search:** it walks day by day and checks the candidate times in order, so it is fast even for rare schedules. Leap-day schedules resolve in a few thousand day steps.\n- **Rejection:** if nothing fires within 5 years, it raises `ValueError` instead of looping.\n\nChoices I made:\n- **The 5-year horizon is literal.** Rule 8 says to raise if the schedule can't fire within 5 years, so `0 0 29 2 *` from 2097-03-01 raises. The next 29 February after that is in 2104, which is more than 5 years away. Rule 9's \"at most ~4 years\" is wrong around the 2100 non-leap year, where the gap is 8 years. If you want leap-day schedules always found, the horizon needs to be longer for that case. That is a one-line change.\n- **Extra `ValueError` on non-string input**, since the rules don't say what to do there.\n\nThis isn't a git repository, so I didn't commit anything. The test file is at `/tmp/cron_tests/test_cron.py`, outside the work directory.",
  "ttft_ms": 1820,
  "type": "result",
  "duration_ms": 65433,
  "uuid": "[REDACTED]",
  "ttft_stream_ms": 1630,
  "time_to_request_ms": 245,
  "first_content_frame_ms": 1630,
  "queued_turn_count": 0,
  "result_index": 0
 }
]