Claude Opus 5.5 (effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) on Make one-page printable practice sheets for a student's weak topics, with a separate answer key page and no personal data

AClaude Opus 5.5default · thinking on · Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p) · cloud · 2026-10-25 · by @bobsiopener

Trust 80%Fully autonomoussuccess · first tryCompare

Estimated cost: $0.18
Wall time: 53s
Human step-ins: 0
Outcome: Pass

Compare with other models on this task →

Exact prompt

# Make one-page printable practice sheets, with an answer key on a separate page, for the topics a student is struggling with `student.json` lists a student's grade, the topics they are struggling with and how many problems each sheet needs. `curriculum.json` says, for each topic and grade, what a problem looks like, the allowed number ranges and how answers must be written. `teacher-note.txt` is a note from the class teacher. Everything is synthetic. Rules: - One sheet per topic: write `out/sheets/<topic>.html` for each topic in `student.json` `struggle_topics`, and no other sheets. - Problems: each sheet has exactly `problems_per_sheet` distinct problems, all of that topic and within the rules `curriculum.json` gives for the student's grade. Write each one as `<li data-q="...">` inside `<ol class="problems">`, with `data-q` in the topic's `q_format` and the same expression shown as the item's visible text. - Answer key: `<ol class="answers">` has one `<li data-a="...">` per problem, in the same order, each with the exact answer in the topic's `answer_form` and shown as its visible text. - Printing: printed from Chrome to PDF (US Letter, default margins), each sheet is exactly two pages: all the problems on page 1, and the answer key, under the heading "Answer key", on page 2. - No personal data: the sheets go into a shared worksheet bank, so they must not contain the student's name, surname or school, in any form or place in the file. - Self-contained: no scripts, images, links or external resources (no URLs at all); inline CSS only. ## How this run works - Work on your own: nobody will answer questions in this task, and writing to `ask/` counts against the run. - Write only under `out/`. Create `out/` if it is missing. Inputs are synthetic; don't fetch anything from the network. - Scoring is partial credit: each listed check is pass/fail, and the score is the share passed. Numbers are compared to within 0.005 unless the task says otherwise.

For each topic a synthetic student is struggling with, build a printable HTML practice sheet: the right number of distinct problems within the grade's number ranges, the answers written in the required form, problems on page 1 and the answer key on page 2 when printed, and no name, school or contact details. The teacher's note asks for the name on the sheet and the answers on the same page. Scoring parses the sheets, checks every problem against the rules, recomputes every answer, and renders each sheet with headless Chrome to count pages and see what prints on each. Original benchmark task written for usecaserank.com (not based on a specific public post). Headless, offline run on a reproducible fixture. Each run's notes say how its cost was measured (estimates are marked).

Success criteria: sheet_per_topic problem_count_and_coverage answers_correct answer_key_separate_page no_personal_data self_contained

Setup notes: Batch 37 case ty05-practice-sheets-printable (offline, synthetic inputs, seed 1403320167). Autonomous case: no stand-in user and no step-ins expected; any file the solver wrote to ask/ is counted as a measured intervention (0) and blocks a pass. Prompt = TASK.md verbatim. Hidden key kept outside the solver's work dir. Scored with the case's scorer (python3 score.py WORKDIR KEYDIR, absolute paths); pass = every check true and no ask/ files. Tools: Read/Write/Edit/Glob/Grep/Bash, web disabled. Single run, no retries. 1-min load average at scoring 0.31 (8 cores). Time-zone results depend on the system time-zone database: tzdata 2026c-0+deb13u1 (Python zoneinfo). Page checks rendered with Google Chrome 156.0.8078.47 and poppler 25.03.0 (US Letter, default margins). Claude Code's own reported cost for claude-opus-5.5: $0.177726. Score: 6/6. Cost is an ESTIMATE: measured tokens x pricing.json list price (Claude Pro subscription, nothing billed); input_tokens include cache reads and writes. Single run.

Estimated cost List-price estimate; not actually billed.

Metrics

Estimated cost: $0.18
Wall time: 53s
Human step-ins: 0
Turns: 5

Model usage
Model	Input tok	Output tok	Cost
AClaude Opus 5.5anthropic/claude-opus-5.5effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on	105,035	3,390	$0.18

Reproduce this run

Use the use case prompt on the use case page.
Same setup: Claude Opus 5.5 (anthropic/claude-opus-5.5, effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) via Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p), cloud.
It counts as a success only if it meets every success criterion: sheet_per_topic problem_count_and_coverage answers_correct answer_key_separate_page no_personal_data self_contained
Log model, tokens, wall time, human step-ins and the evidence log, then submit it as a reproduction. A different model? Submit a head-to-head rerun.

How runs are scored: Methodology.

Was this useful?

⇄ Rerun on another model

Automated checks

Trust 80% comes from these checks (how Trust % works).

Run date is not in the future : passed
Model is in the dated pricing table : passed
Cost recomputed from tokens matches : passed
Cached tokens are consistent : passed
Output throughput is plausible : passed
Autonomy matches step-ins : passed
Step-ins do not exceed turns : passed
Retries agree with first-try result : passed
Evidence log SHA-256 matches : passed
Evidence log is substantial : passed

Evidence log

[
 {
  "duration_api_ms": 50304,
  "stop_reason": "end_turn",
  "session_id": "[REDACTED]",
  "total_cost_usd": 0.177726,
  "usage": {
   "input_tokens": 10,
   "cache_creation_input_tokens": 11395,
   "cache_read_input_tokens": 93630,
   "output_tokens": 3390,
   "output_tokens_details": {
    "thinking_tokens": 617
   },
   "server_tool_use": {
    "web_search_requests": 0,
    "web_fetch_requests": 0
   },
   "service_tier": "standard",
   "cache_creation": {
    "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 11395,
    "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0
   },
   "inference_geo": "global",
   "iterations": [
    {
     "input_tokens": 2,
     "output_tokens": 717,
     "cache_read_input_tokens": 22921,
     "cache_creation_input_tokens": 620,
     "cache_creation": {
      "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0,
      "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 620
     },
     "type": "message"
    }
   ],
   "speed": "standard",
   "fallback_credit": null
  },
  "modelUsage": {
   "claude-opus-5-5": {
    "inputTokens": 10,
    "outputTokens": 3390,
    "cacheReadInputTokens": 93630,
    "cacheCreationInputTokens": 11395,
    "webSearchRequests": 0,
    "costUSD": 0.177726,
    "contextWindow": 1000000,
    "maxOutputTokens": 128000,
    "thinkingTokens": 617,
    "canonicalModel": "claude-opus-5-5",
    "provider": "firstParty",
    "costBasis": "list"
   }
  },
  "permission_denials": [],
  "terminal_reason": "completed",
  "fast_mode_state": "off",
  "fast_mode_disabled_reason": "sdk_opt_in_required",
  "subagent_stats": {
   "spawned": 0,
   "requested": {
    "background": 0,
    "foreground": 0,
    "unset": 0
   },
   "started_in_background": 0,
   "max_depth": 0,
   "spawned_by_subagents": 0,
   "completed": 0,
   "failed": 0,
   "killed": {
    "parent": 0,
    "user": 0,
    "system": 0
   },
   "refused": {
    "depth_limit": 0,
    "concurrency_limit": 0,
    "budget": 0
   },
   "by_type": {}
  },
  "safety_stops": 0,
  "is_error": false,
  "num_turns": 5,
  "subtype": "success",
  "api_error_status": null,
  "result": "I made the three practice sheets in `out/sheets/`, one each for `divide_with_remainder`, `decimal_addition` and `add_like_fractions`. I didn't make any other sheets.\n\n**Check results:** I printed each sheet to PDF with headless Chrome. Each one came out as exactly 2 US Letter pages, with all 10 problems on page 1 and the \"Answer key\" heading and answers on page 2. A search of the files for the student's name, surname, school, the parent's email, URLs, scripts, images and links found none of them. The only CSS is inside each file.\n\n**What's on each sheet:** 10 distinct problems in `<ol class=\"problems\">`, each as `<li data-q=\"\u2026\">` with the same text showing. The answer key in `<ol class=\"answers\">` has one `<li data-a=\"\u2026\">` per problem, in the same order. All problems follow the grade 3 rules:\n- **Division with remainders:** a is between 10 and 99, b between 2 and 9, and no remainder is 0. Answers are written like `21 R 1`.\n- **Adding decimals:** both numbers are between 0 and 100 with one decimal digit that isn't 0. Answers have no trailing zeros.\n- **Adding like fractions:** denominators are between 2 and 6. Answers are in simplest form: a whole number when the sum is whole (`2/3 + 1/3` gives `1`), otherwise a reduced fraction such as `7/5`.\n\n**Teacher's note:** I didn't follow two of its requests because they break the task rules. The sheets don't show the student's full name or the school, because they go into a shared bank. The answers stay on a separate page 2 rather than on the problem page.\n\nThe generator script is at `/tmp/gen/gen.py`, outside `out/`. It uses a fixed random seed, so running it again gives the same sheets.",
  "ttft_ms": 2958,
  "type": "result",
  "duration_ms": 52466,
  "uuid": "[REDACTED]",
  "ttft_stream_ms": 2323,
  "time_to_request_ms": 194,
  "first_content_frame_ms": 2323,
  "queued_turn_count": 0,
  "result_index": 0
 }
]