Claude Haiku 5.5 (effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) on Write an atomic, idempotent SQLite v1→v2 migration with dedupe, FK and CHECK constraints
AClaude Haiku 5.5default · thinking on · Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p) · cloud · 2026-10-16 · by @bobsiopener
- Estimated cost
- $0.01
- Wall time
- 53s
- Human step-ins
- 0
- Outcome
- Pass
Compare with other models on this task →
Summary
Exact prompt
# Task: write a safe schema migration (SQLite) `app.db` is at schema v1: `users(id, full_name, email, created 'DD/MM/YYYY')`, `orders(id, user_email, total_cents, status)`. Write `migrate.py` (stdlib sqlite3) that upgrades `app.db` IN PLACE to v2: - `users(id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, first_name TEXT NOT NULL, last_name TEXT NOT NULL, email TEXT NOT NULL UNIQUE, created_at TEXT NOT NULL)` — trim names; first_name = first word, last_name = the rest ("Chloé de Vries" → "Chloé", "de Vries"); email lowercased+trimmed; created_at ISO `YYYY-MM-DD`. - Users whose emails differ only by case/whitespace are duplicates: keep the LOWEST id, delete the others, and re-point their orders. - `orders(id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, user_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES users(id), total_cents INTEGER NOT NULL, status TEXT NOT NULL CHECK(status IN ('paid','refunded','pending')))` — user_id resolved via email (case-insensitive); status normalised (trim + lowercase). - Table `schema_version(version INTEGER)` containing exactly one row `2`. - Must be atomic (all-or-nothing in one transaction) and idempotent: running `python migrate.py` again on a v2 database must change nothing and exit 0. Keep order ids and kept user ids unchanged. Run it once so `app.db` is migrated. No network.
Scorer re-runs migrate.py twice on a fresh v1 db (dump hash must not change), checks exact schema, constraints, merged duplicate users and re-pointed orders. Original benchmark task written for usecaserank.com (not based on a specific public post). Headless, offline run on a reproducible fixture. Each run's notes say how its cost was measured (estimates are marked).
Success criteria: 1. Scorer builds a fresh v1 database, runs migrate.py twice: both runs exit 0 and the database dump is identical after run 1 and run 2 (idempotent). 2. users schema exactly: id INTEGER, first_name TEXT NOT NULL, last_name TEXT NOT NULL, email TEXT NOT NULL, created_at TEXT NOT NULL (in that order); orders columns id, user_id, total_cents, status with the stated types; orders has a foreign key to users. 3. CHECK constraint rejects an invalid status; UNIQUE constraint rejects a duplicate email. 4. schema_version contains exactly one row with value 2. 5. User and order counts match the key (duplicates merged); orders per user and total cents per user match exactly (orders re-pointed to the kept lowest id); status counts after normalisation match. 6. Every kept user row (names split, email lowercased, ISO date) matches exactly. 7. The agent's own migrated app.db must also pass all the data/schema checks.
Setup notes: Use Case Scout batch 4 case d04-sqlite-schema-migration (offline fixture). Prepared with batch4/prepare.sh; hidden key/tests kept outside the agent's work dir. Prompt = TASK.md verbatim. Scored with the scout's scorer: `python score.py WORKDIR KEYDIR/key.json`. Tools: Read/Write/Edit/Glob/Grep/Bash, web disabled. Single run, no retries. Claude Code's own reported cost for claude-haiku-5.5: $0.011527. Score: 13/13 checks. Cost is an ESTIMATE: measured tokens x pricing.json list price (Claude Pro subscription, nothing billed); input_tokens include cache reads and writes. Single run.
Estimated cost List-price estimate; not actually billed.
Metrics
- Estimated cost
- $0.01
- Wall time
- 53s
- Human step-ins
- 0
- Turns
- 7
| Model | Input tok | Output tok | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| AClaude Haiku 5.5anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on | 185,799 | 11,119 | $0.01 |
Reproduce this run
- Use the use case prompt on the use case page.
- Same setup: Claude Haiku 5.5 (anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5, effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) via
Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p), cloud. - It counts as a success only if it meets every success criterion: 1. Scorer builds a fresh v1 database, runs migrate.py twice: both runs exit 0 and the database dump is identical after run 1 and run 2 (idempotent). 2. users schema exactly: id INTEGER, first_name TEXT NOT NULL, last_name TEXT NOT NULL, email TEXT NOT NULL, created_at TEXT NOT NULL (in that order); orders columns id, user_id, total_cents, status with the stated types; orders has a foreign key to users. 3. CHECK constraint rejects an invalid status; UNIQUE constraint rejects a duplicate email. 4. schema_version contains exactly one row with value 2. 5. User and order counts match the key (duplicates merged); orders per user and total cents per user match exactly (orders re-pointed to the kept lowest id); status counts after normalisation match. 6. Every kept user row (names split, email lowercased, ISO date) matches exactly. 7. The agent's own migrated app.db must also pass all the data/schema checks.
- Log model, tokens, wall time, human step-ins and the evidence log, then submit it as a reproduction. A different model? Submit a head-to-head rerun.
How runs are scored: Methodology.
Was this useful?
Automated checks
Trust 80% comes from these checks (how Trust % works).
- Run date is not in the future : passed
- Model is in the dated pricing table : passed
- Cost recomputed from tokens matches : passed
- Cached tokens are consistent : passed
- Output throughput is plausible : passed
- Autonomy matches step-ins : passed
- Step-ins do not exceed turns : passed
- Retries agree with first-try result : passed
- Evidence log SHA-256 matches : passed
- Evidence log is substantial : passed
Evidence log
[
{
"duration_api_ms": 52103,
"stop_reason": "end_turn",
"session_id": "[REDACTED]",
"total_cost_usd": 0.01152731,
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 14,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 21624,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 164161,
"output_tokens": 11119,
"output_tokens_details": {
"thinking_tokens": 5510
},
"server_tool_use": {
"web_search_requests": 0,
"web_fetch_requests": 0
},
"service_tier": "standard",
"cache_creation": {
"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 21624,
"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0
},
"inference_geo": "global",
"iterations": [
{
"input_tokens": 2,
"output_tokens": 759,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 32818,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 1345,
"cache_creation": {
"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0,
"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 1345
},
"type": "message"
}
],
"speed": "standard",
"fallback_credit": null
},
"modelUsage": {
"claude-haiku-5-5": {
"inputTokens": 14,
"outputTokens": 11119,
"cacheReadInputTokens": 164161,
"cacheCreationInputTokens": 21624,
"webSearchRequests": 0,
"costUSD": 0.01152731,
"contextWindow": 1000000,
"maxOutputTokens": 128000,
"thinkingTokens": 5510,
"canonicalModel": "claude-haiku-5-5",
"provider": "firstParty",
"costBasis": "list"
}
},
"permission_denials": [],
"terminal_reason": "completed",
"fast_mode_state": "off",
"fast_mode_disabled_reason": "sdk_opt_in_required",
"subagent_stats": {
"spawned": 0,
"requested": {
"background": 0,
"foreground": 0,
"unset": 0
},
"started_in_background": 0,
"max_depth": 0,
"spawned_by_subagents": 0,
"completed": 0,
"failed": 0,
"killed": {
"parent": 0,
"user": 0,
"system": 0
},
"refused": {
"depth_limit": 0,
"concurrency_limit": 0,
"budget": 0
},
"by_type": {}
},
"safety_stops": 0,
"is_error": false,
"num_turns": 7,
"subtype": "success",
"api_error_status": null,
"result": "`app.db` is now at schema v2, and `migrate.py` is in the work directory.\n\n**Result of the run:**\n- 170 users kept, 30 duplicates removed, 1000 orders kept. Order ids and kept user ids are unchanged.\n- `schema_version` holds one row, `2`. Foreign-key and integrity checks pass, and no order is orphaned.\n- Order statuses are now `paid` 432, `pending` 289, `refunded` 279.\n- A second `python migrate.py` reports \"already at schema v2; nothing to do\" and exits 0.\n\n**How the script works:**\n- The whole upgrade runs in one `BEGIN IMMEDIATE` transaction. All rows are computed in Python first, so bad data aborts before anything is written.\n- Any failure rolls back and exits 1. I confirmed this on a scratch copy with one orphan order: the file's checksum was unchanged afterwards.\n- Idempotency comes from the `schema_version` check inside the transaction.\n- The database path defaults to `app.db` next to the script; an optional argument overrides it.\n\n**Things you should know:**\n- **Duplicate data was discarded, not merged.** The 30 deleted rows had different names and dates from the kept row. For example, id 169 \"Hana Ng\" shares an email with id 1 \"Ben Park\", and id 1 was kept. The rule you specified keeps the lowest id's data. The deleted rows' ids and the kept id each one mapped to were printed during the run.\n- **Backup:** I copied the original to `app.db.v1.bak` before migrating. It's the only copy of the deleted duplicate rows, so keep it or delete it deliberately.\n- **Single-word names abort the migration.** The spec needs a non-null `last_name`, and none of the current data has single-word names. A future one will stop the run with an error rather than guess a last name.",
"ttft_ms": 1742,
"type": "result",
"duration_ms": 52817,
"uuid": "[REDACTED]",
"ttft_stream_ms": 1504,
"time_to_request_ms": 289,
"first_content_frame_ms": 1505,
"queued_turn_count": 0,
"result_index": 0
}
]