Claude Haiku 5.5 (effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) on Undo/redo with typing coalescing for a text buffer (word boundaries, 2-second gap, backspace vs forward-delete groups, history cap)

AClaude Haiku 5.5default · thinking on · Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p) · cloud · 2026-10-20 · by @bobsiopener

Trust 80%Fully autonomoussuccess · first tryCompare

Estimated cost: $0.01
Wall time: 58s
Human step-ins: 0
Outcome: Pass

Compare with other models on this task →

Exact prompt

# Undo/redo with typing coalescing for a text buffer `editor.py` is the text buffer behind our notes app. Users expect one undo to remove a whole typed word, not one letter. Rewrite `Editor` (Python 3 stdlib only) with this exact behaviour. API: `Editor(text="")`, attribute `.text`, `insert(pos, s, t)`, `delete(pos, n, t)`, `undo() -> bool`, `redo() -> bool`. `t` is the edit time in seconds (float; compare with plain subtraction `t - last <= 2.0`; the hidden tests never use times where floating-point rounding could change that comparison). ## Edits 1. `insert`: `pos` must be an int with `0 <= pos <= len(text)`, else `ValueError`. Inserting `""` changes nothing and is not recorded (but positions and time are still validated). 2. `delete(pos, n, t)` removes `text[pos:pos+n]`; `pos` and `n` must be ints with `n >= 1`, `pos >= 0`, `pos + n <= len(text)`, else `ValueError`. 3. `t` must never be smaller than the `t` of the previous recorded edit, else `ValueError` (nothing changes). Validation errors leave everything unchanged. ## Undo groups 4. Every recorded edit either **joins** the most recent undo group or starts a new one. A new edit can only join if: the most recent group is still **open** (no `undo()`/`redo()` call happened since that group was last changed), the group was created by a **single-character** edit (a multi-character insert or delete is a group of its own that never accepts more edits), the new edit is a single character, `t - (time of the group's last edit) <= 2.0`, and the group currently holds **fewer than 20 characters**. 5. **Typing:** a 1-char insert joins an insert group if `pos` equals group start + group text length (typing right after it) and the group's last character is not a space or `\n` (a space/newline is still added to the group, but ends it for further typing). 6. **Deleting:** a 1-char delete joins a delete group either as **backspace** (`pos + 1 ==` group start; the group start moves to `pos`) or as **forward delete** (`pos ==` group start). A group's direction is fixed by its second delete; after that only the same direction joins. 7. Insert never joins a delete group and vice versa. 8. `undo()` reverts the most recent group as a whole and moves it to the redo stack; `redo()` re-applies the most recently undone group. Both return `False` (and change nothing else, except closing the open group) when their stack is empty, else `True`. Any recorded edit (including one that joins a group) clears the redo stack. 9. The undo stack keeps at most **50** groups; when a 51st is pushed (by a new group or by `redo`), the oldest is dropped. ## Scoring Hidden check groups (partial credit = fraction passed; all must pass): `validation` (1-3), `typing_groups` (4-5), `word_boundaries` (5), `time_gap` (4: exactly 2.0 s joins, 2.0001 s does not), `delete_directions` (6-7), `undo_redo_semantics` (8), `group_limits` (4: 20-char cap; 9: 50 groups), `randomized_agreement` (500 random sequences of 60 operations: `.text` and every return value must match the rules after each step).

Many small interacting rules (group closing on undo/redo, multi-character groups that never join, direction fixed by the second delete, 20-character cap, 50-group cap including redo) compared step by step on 500 random sequences. Original benchmark task written for usecaserank.com (not based on a specific public post). Headless, offline run on a reproducible fixture. Each run's notes say how its cost was measured (estimates are marked).

Success criteria: 1. validation 2. typing_groups 3. word_boundaries 4. time_gap 5. delete_directions 6. undo_redo_semantics 7. group_limits 8. randomized_agreement (500 sequences)

Setup notes: Use Case Scout batch 8 case i11-editor-undo-coalescing (offline fixture). Prepared with batch8/prepare.sh; hidden key/tests kept outside the agent's work dir. Prompt = TASK.md verbatim. Scored with the scout's scorer: `python score.py WORKDIR KEYDIR`. Tools: Read/Write/Edit/Glob/Grep/Bash, web disabled. Single run, no retries. Claude Code's own reported cost for claude-haiku-5.5: $0.011906. Score: 8/8. Cost is an ESTIMATE: measured tokens x pricing.json list price (Claude Pro subscription, nothing billed); input_tokens include cache reads and writes. Single run.

Estimated cost List-price estimate; not actually billed.

Metrics

Estimated cost: $0.01
Wall time: 58s
Human step-ins: 0
Turns: 6

Model usage
Model	Input tok	Output tok	Cost
AClaude Haiku 5.5anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on	160,318	12,539	$0.01

Reproduce this run

Use the use case prompt on the use case page.
Same setup: Claude Haiku 5.5 (anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5, effort default (no --effort flag) · thinking on) via Claude Code 2.1.299 (headless -p), cloud.
It counts as a success only if it meets every success criterion: 1. validation 2. typing_groups 3. word_boundaries 4. time_gap 5. delete_directions 6. undo_redo_semantics 7. group_limits 8. randomized_agreement (500 sequences)
Log model, tokens, wall time, human step-ins and the evidence log, then submit it as a reproduction. A different model? Submit a head-to-head rerun.

How runs are scored: Methodology.

Was this useful?

⇄ Rerun on another model

Automated checks

Trust 80% comes from these checks (how Trust % works).

Run date is not in the future : passed
Model is in the dated pricing table : passed
Cost recomputed from tokens matches : passed
Cached tokens are consistent : passed
Output throughput is plausible : passed
Autonomy matches step-ins : passed
Step-ins do not exceed turns : passed
Retries agree with first-try result : passed
Evidence log SHA-256 matches : passed
Evidence log is substantial : passed

Evidence log

[
 {
  "duration_api_ms": 57317,
  "stop_reason": "end_turn",
  "session_id": "[REDACTED]",
  "total_cost_usd": 0.011905750000000001,
  "usage": {
   "input_tokens": 12,
   "cache_creation_input_tokens": 21221,
   "cache_read_input_tokens": 139085,
   "output_tokens": 12539,
   "output_tokens_details": {
    "thinking_tokens": 8653
   },
   "server_tool_use": {
    "web_search_requests": 0,
    "web_fetch_requests": 0
   },
   "service_tier": "standard",
   "cache_creation": {
    "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 21221,
    "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0
   },
   "inference_geo": "global",
   "iterations": [
    {
     "input_tokens": 2,
     "output_tokens": 475,
     "cache_read_input_tokens": 33248,
     "cache_creation_input_tokens": 512,
     "cache_creation": {
      "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0,
      "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 512
     },
     "type": "message"
    }
   ],
   "speed": "standard",
   "fallback_credit": null
  },
  "modelUsage": {
   "claude-haiku-5-5": {
    "inputTokens": 12,
    "outputTokens": 12539,
    "cacheReadInputTokens": 139085,
    "cacheCreationInputTokens": 21221,
    "webSearchRequests": 0,
    "costUSD": 0.011905750000000001,
    "contextWindow": 1000000,
    "maxOutputTokens": 128000,
    "thinkingTokens": 8653,
    "canonicalModel": "claude-haiku-5-5",
    "provider": "firstParty",
    "costBasis": "list"
   }
  },
  "permission_denials": [],
  "terminal_reason": "completed",
  "fast_mode_state": "off",
  "fast_mode_disabled_reason": "sdk_opt_in_required",
  "subagent_stats": {
   "spawned": 0,
   "requested": {
    "background": 0,
    "foreground": 0,
    "unset": 0
   },
   "started_in_background": 0,
   "max_depth": 0,
   "spawned_by_subagents": 0,
   "completed": 0,
   "failed": 0,
   "killed": {
    "parent": 0,
    "user": 0,
    "system": 0
   },
   "refused": {
    "depth_limit": 0,
    "concurrency_limit": 0,
    "budget": 0
   },
   "by_type": {}
  },
  "safety_stops": 0,
  "is_error": false,
  "num_turns": 6,
  "subtype": "success",
  "api_error_status": null,
  "result": "I rewrote `Editor` in `editor.py` (stdlib only) to the spec in `TASK.md`. It passes my scenario checks, but I have not run the hidden test groups, and I did not write a brute-force reference for the 500-sequence randomized check.\n\nThe checks cover the spec's own examples: word-level typing groups, the 2.0 s gap boundary, the 20-char cap, backspace and forward-delete coalescing, direction switching, insert/delete never mixing, validation leaving state unchanged, redo being cleared by any edit, and the 50-group limit. One expectation in my own test was wrong at first; the editor was correct, and I fixed the test.\n\nChoices I made where the spec was open:\n- **Empty insert:** it is not recorded and does not change the last-edit time. Its `t` is still checked against the previous recorded edit, so it can raise `ValueError`.\n- **Booleans as ints:** `pos`, `n` and `pos` on insert reject `True`/`False` even though `bool` is a subclass of `int`.\n- **Open group:** `undo()` and `redo()` always close the open group, even when their stack is empty.\n- **Git:** the directory is not a git repository, so I did not commit anything.",
  "ttft_ms": 1339,
  "type": "result",
  "duration_ms": 57828,
  "uuid": "[REDACTED]",
  "ttft_stream_ms": 1098,
  "time_to_request_ms": 267,
  "first_content_frame_ms": 1098,
  "queued_turn_count": 0,
  "result_index": 0
 }
]